Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
52 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
5th of 203 payment processors
Closing balance

Named in

19of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Adyen

AI assistants name Adyen in 31.7% of answers, which is much more often than the typical company in its sector. Adyen's overall score is 45 out of 100, ranking 52nd of 2,219 companies. Its website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks showing some readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Adyen by name. AI assistants named it in 19 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 21st of 375 in its sector. The typical cards and payments company is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
45Overall score
  • Visibility33
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment85
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness29
Summary of account
Named by AI in
31.7%
19 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
38.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
8 of 375
by overall score, where the typical cards and payments company scores 27

Get the full report on Adyen as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Adyen came up on 9 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What are the most reliable payment platforms for businesses operating in multiple countries?4/4
  2. 02Why might settlements or payouts be delayed on enterprise payment platforms?0/4
  3. 03What should enterprises look for in a payment processing solution to manage multiple revenue streams?0/4
  4. 04Which payment solutions offer integrated data insights for large businesses?2/4
  5. 05What are common ways enterprises use centralized payment and financial product stacks to improve operations?0/4
  6. 06Which other types of solutions can replace enterprise payment processors for managing global transactions?1/4
  7. 07What are the best fintech platforms for global enterprises to manage payments and financial products?4/4
  8. 08Is an all-in-one payment and financial product platform worth it for global businesses?1/4
  9. 09What are alternatives to using a unified fintech platform for handling payments and data management?4/4
  10. 10What pricing models do enterprise fintech platforms typically offer for payment processing?0/4
  11. 11How can global businesses resolve declined transactions with integrated fintech systems?0/4
  12. 12How can large companies leverage fintech platforms for offering embedded finance to customers?1/4
  13. 13How do unified fintech platforms compare to traditional merchant acquirers for enterprise payments?1/4
  14. 14Enterprise payment processors vs. end-to-end financial platforms: what are the main differences?1/4
  15. 15How do volume discounts work on large-scale payments platforms?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 4/15Claude: 5/15Perplexity: 4/15Gemini: 6/15All assistants: 19/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

Gemininamed the company

“Which other types of solutions can replace enterprise payment processors for managing global transactions?”

While enterprise payment processors like Adyen, Stripe, and Worldpay are popular for managing global transactions, several other solutions can serve as alternatives, offering varying benefits in terms of cost, control, and efficiency.

Here are some alternative types of solutions:

Virtual Accounts (Virtual IBANs/Bank Accounts): These are digital accounts that function like traditional bank accounts, allowing businesses to send and receive international payments without needing to open multiple physical bank accounts in different countries. Virtual accounts provide local bank details ( …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Stripe
    33

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Stripe
    44.0%
  2. Adyen
    38.0%
  3. FISERV (Carat Enterprise Payments Platform)
    14.0%
  4. FIS (Worldpay)
    4.0%
  5. PayPal for Enterprise (Braintree)
    0.0%
  6. Chase Payment Solutions
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    stripe.com
    27
  2. 02
    airwallex.com
    18
  3. 03
    connectpay.com
    15
  4. 04
    paystand.com
    8
  5. 05
    finix.com
    7
  6. 06
    adyen.com (its own website)
    7
  7. 07
    highradius.com
    6
  8. 08
    nuvei.com
    6
  9. 09
    paypal.com
    5
  10. 10
    checkout.com
    5

Adyen is in the study as a payment processor.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
6/15
Claude
5/15
Perplexity
4/15
OpenAI
4/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Adyen compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
33

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
85

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with cards and payments companies

375 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
45
Ranks 8 of 375. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
31.7%
Ranks 21 of 375. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 106 of 375. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with payment processors

203 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
45
Ranks 4 of 203. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
31.7%
Ranks 7 of 203. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 59 of 203. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Adyen publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check

The website runs on Magento.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 36 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.adyen.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Adyen as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 45 of 100 badge for Adyen

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/adyen.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/adyen.com.svg" alt="Overall score 45 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo