- Visibility37
- Citations2
- Sentiment50
- Site quality87
- AI readiness36
AI assistants name Zoom Communications in 46.7% of answers, much more often than the typical company in its sector at 10%. Its overall score is 41 out of 100, which ranks 276th of 2,047 companies in the study. The company's website passes 5 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the technology market: none named Zoom Communications. AI assistants named it in 28 of 60 answers (46.7%). The typical technology company is named in 10.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Zoom Communications ranks 19 of 273 in its sector.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
273 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
An answer that names the company
“What are typical pricing tiers for business communication platforms in the US?”
Typical US pricing tiers for business communication platforms usually fall into these ranges:
Free: \( \$0 \) for basic messaging, meetings, or limited collaboration features
Entry / Starter / Basic: about \( \$4\)–\( \$8 \) per user/month, often for team chat or simple calling plans
Mid-tier / Business / Pro: about \( \$12\)–\( \$25 \) per user/month, usually adding integrations, analytics, video, and more admin controls
Upper-tier / Advanced / Premium: about \( \$25\)–\( \$40+ \) per user/month, often with advanced reporting, AI fea …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 2: Bot-aware. Explicit AI bot rules and declared Content Signals.
- Markdown negotiation
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
- study: 86.8%SitemapPassed
An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPartly met
Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsPassed
Content-Signal lines in robots.txt declaring search, AI input and AI training preferences.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogPartly met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryPassed
OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdCould not check
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardPassed
A server card describing the MCP server, its transport and capabilities.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsPassed
A skills index at /.well-known/agent-skills/index.json that agents can load.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPNot met
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 52 of 100 · 98% of checks could run · checked on October 3, 2026 · www.zoom.com · 2,047 companies scanned
5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- PassedAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.
- GPTBotpartly
- ClaudeBotpartly
- Anthropic-AIpartly
- Google-Extendedpartly
- Applebot-Extendedpartly
- Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
- FacebookBotpartly
- Bytespiderpartly
- CCBotpartly
- Diffbotpartly
- Omgilibotpartly
- OAI-SearchBotpartly
- Claude-SearchBotpartly
- PerplexityBotpartly
- Applebotpartly
- Amazonbotpartly
- YouBotpartly
- ChatGPT-Userpartly
- Claude-Userpartly
- Perplexity-Userpartly
- DuckAssistBotpartly
- MistralAI-Userpartly
Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as US-listed.
- What are typical pricing tiers for business communication platforms in the US?
- Is investing in an all-in-one business communication suite worth it for small businesses?
- What are some alternatives to traditional corporate meeting software for hybrid teams?
- How do I resolve frequent connection issues during virtual team calls?
- What are the best unified communication platforms for remote teams?
- Cloud-based collaboration platforms vs. on-premises solutions: Which is better for growing companies?
- Which collaboration tools are most effective for virtual meetings and document sharing?
- Why is my video quality poor during online meetings, and how can I fix it?
- How do video conferencing solutions compare to traditional phone systems for business communication?
- What features should I look for when choosing a team productivity and meeting platform?
- What are low-cost alternatives to premium business collaboration suites?
- Are there free all-in-one team collaboration tools suitable for startups?
- What are effective ways to use whiteboard and note-taking features in business communication platforms?
- How can unified collaboration tools streamline project management for distributed teams?
- Which unified messaging platforms work well for companies with a mobile workforce?
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.
A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.
<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/zoom.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/zoom.com.svg" alt="Overall score 41 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>