Back to the study

Zoetis

zoetis.com · Healthcare · ZTS

Ranked 1,542 of 2,047 companies in the study

27Overall score
  • Visibility8
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Zoetis

AI assistants rarely name Zoetis, mentioning it in 2 out of 60 answers, sometimes alongside Elanco. Its overall score is 27 out of 100, ranking 1,542nd of 2,047 companies. The company's website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the healthcare market: none named Zoetis. AI assistants named it in 2 of 60 answers (3.3%). The typical healthcare company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Zoetis ranks 48 of 105 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
3.3%
2 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
15.4%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
75 of 105
by overall score, where the typical healthcare company scores 31
How Zoetis compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
8

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with healthcare

105 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score27
Ranks 75 of 105. Typical company: 31
Named in answers3%
Ranks 48 of 105. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness21
Ranks 53 of 105. Typical company: 21
What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

“Is it beneficial to invest in next-generation parasite control solutions for pets and livestock?”

Short answer: yes—next-generation parasite-control solutions for pets and livestock look like a promising investment area, but they carry meaningful technical, regulatory, and commercial risk. Below I summarize the key reasons to be bullish, the main risks, and a practical due‑diligence checklist to help decide whether (and how) to invest.

Why it looks attractive

Growing market demand: multiple market reports project mid-to-high single-digit to low double-digit CAGR for the global veterinary/parasiticide market over the 2026–2033/2035 period driven by rising pet ownership, expanding livesto …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Elanco2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Elanco
37.5%
Merck Animal Health (MSD Animal Health)
37.5%
Zoetis
25.0%
Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health USA
0.0%
Ceva Animal Health
0.0%
Virbac US
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
1/15
OpenAI
1/15
Claude
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.zoetis.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
46
aaha.org
15
merckvetmanual.com
15
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
11
merck-animal-health-usa.com
11
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
11
frontiersin.org
9
fda.gov
7
vcahospitals.com
6
sustainablevet.org
6

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (2 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Is it beneficial to invest in next-generation parasite control solutions for pets and livestock?
  • What are the best animal health products for managing herd wellness on US livestock farms?
  • What factors affect the price of preventive health packages for companion animals?
  • Which vaccines are recommended for preventative care in companion animals in the United States?
  • Are there holistic approaches to parasite prevention in backyard poultry management?
  • Difference between prescription and over-the-counter animal health supplements for joint care?
  • How can veterinarians improve recovery rates for pets after soft tissue surgery using latest medicines?
  • How to address cattle not responding to standard antibiotic treatment?
  • What should I do if a routine vaccine causes unexpected side effects in a horse?
  • Best prevention strategies for respiratory disease outbreaks in commercial poultry operations?
  • How do injectable animal antibiotics compare to oral formulations for effectiveness and safety?
  • Alternatives to conventional antibiotics for controlling infections in livestock herds?
  • Are premium animal pharmaceuticals worth the higher cost for dairy cattle health?
  • What non-pharmaceutical options support joint health in aging dogs?
  • Average cost of long-acting pain management options for large animals in the US market?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo