Back to the study

XPO

xpo.com · Industrial · XPO

Ranked 749 of 2,047 companies in the study

36Overall score
  • Visibility16
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment71
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness21
What this means for XPO

AI assistants name XPO in 11.7% of their answers, which is more often than the typical company in the Industrial sector at 5%. XPO has an overall score of 36 out of 100, ranking 749th of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named XPO. AI assistants named it in 7 of 60 answers (11.7%). The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, XPO ranks 64 of 246 in its sector.

Named by AI in
11.7%
7 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
22.6%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
78 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How XPO compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
16

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
71

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score36
Ranks 78 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers12%
Ranks 64 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness21
Ranks 107 of 246. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are the best options for asset-based LTL freight shipping for small businesses?”

For small businesses seeking asset-based Less Than Truckload (LTL) freight shipping, several carriers offer reliable services. LTL shipping is a cost-effective solution for businesses that don't need a full truckload, as it allows multiple shippers to share space on a single trailer, paying only for the space their freight occupies. This method is ideal for shipments typically weighing between 150 and 15,000 pounds or occupying 1-6 pallets.

Major Asset-Based LTL Carriers for Small Businesses:

Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL): Consistently ranked highly for its on-time performance …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
R+L Carriers3Estes Express Lines1Old Dominion Freight Line1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

XPO
26.9%
ArcBest (ABF Freight)
19.2%
R+L Carriers
19.2%
Old Dominion Freight Line
15.4%
Estes Express Lines
11.5%
Saia LTL Freight
7.7%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
OpenAI
2/15
Perplexity
2/15
Claude
1/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.xpo.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

rxo.com
24
wearewarp.com
17
atsinc.com
16
redwoodlogistics.com
14
redstagfulfillment.com
12
chrobinson.com
11
odfl.com
11
myfreightworld.com
11
arcb.com
11
schneider.com
11

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (2 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What should I consider before booking LTL freight transportation for my company?
  • How can I track delays or missing information in an LTL shipment?
  • What alternatives are available if LTL freight shipping doesn't fit my needs?
  • How are LTL freight shipping rates calculated in the US?
  • How do LTL freight carriers handle shipments with multiple delivery locations?
  • What are the best options for asset-based LTL freight shipping for small businesses?
  • Are there other logistics solutions for sending palletized freight besides LTL carriers?
  • What are the advantages of national vs regional LTL freight carriers?
  • Is it worth choosing asset-based LTL services over brokered solutions for business shipping?
  • What can I do if my LTL freight shipment arrives damaged?
  • How do I find reliable LTL freight and logistics providers in the US?
  • What are common services included with domestic LTL freight providers?
  • What factors can increase or decrease the cost of LTL freight services?
  • How does asset-based LTL differ from non-asset LTL for domestic shipping?
  • When is asset-based LTL shipping the best option for a business?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 36 of 100 badge for XPO

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/xpo.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/xpo.com.svg" alt="Overall score 36 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo