- Visibility34
- Citations0
- Sentiment50
- Site quality73
- AI readiness36
AI assistants name X (Twitter) in 38.3% of answers, much more often than the typical company in its sector, which is named in 15%. The company has an overall score of 37 out of 100, ranking 617th of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the media market: none named X (Twitter). AI assistants named it in 23 of 60 answers (38.3%). The typical media company is named in 15.0% of answers. By how often it is named, X (Twitter) ranks 28 of 99 in its sector.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
99 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
An answer that names the company
“What alternatives are there to real-time social feeds for following what’s happening now?”
Good question — real-time social feeds (X/Twitter, TikTok, etc.) are fast but noisy. If you want timely awareness without the constant scrolling and misinformation, here are alternative approaches, with pros/cons and quick setup tips.
1. Curated newsletters
What: Daily or hourly emails from trusted journalists, editors, or topic-specific outlets.
Pros: Curated, edited, less noise; you get context and verification.
Cons: Periodic (not minute-by-minute); possible paywall.
Setup tip: Subscribe to one broad daily news digest plus 1–2 focused newsletters (tech, local, finance).
2. Push no …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.
- 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
- study: 86.8%SitemapNot met
Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPartly met
Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 16 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · x.com · 2,047 companies scanned
3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
This website sets rules for 3 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.
- GPTBotblocked
- ClaudeBotblocked
- Anthropic-AIblocked
- Google-Extended*partly
- Applebot-Extendedblocked
- Meta-ExternalAgent*partly
- FacebookBot*partly
- Bytespiderblocked
- CCBotblocked
- Diffbotblocked
- Omgilibotblocked
- OAI-SearchBotblocked
- Claude-SearchBotblocked
- PerplexityBotblocked
- Applebotblocked
- Amazonbotblocked
- YouBotblocked
- ChatGPT-Userblocked
- Claude-Userblocked
- Perplexity-Userblocked
- DuckAssistBotblocked
- MistralAI-Userblocked
Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as Consumer brands. One of the most visited websites in the United States (Similarweb, August 2026). Owned by SpaceX.
- What are the typical costs for ad-free experiences on live commentary platforms?
- What alternatives are there to real-time social feeds for following what’s happening now?
- Where can I find curated summaries instead of real-time streams for news and events?
- What are the best real-time social platforms for following breaking news in the US?
- How do real-time social feeds compare to traditional news apps for staying updated?
- Are there free options for accessing trending conversations and live updates?
- Is it better to join a real-time conversation platform or stick with regular news outlets?
- How can I manage notifications for trending topics on social commentary apps?
- Which live commentary networks are most active during major sports events?
- Short-form social updates vs. long-form blogs: Which is better for getting political news quickly?
- Which platforms offer discussion-focused feeds instead of fast news updates?
- Why am I not seeing the latest updates on my real-time feed?
- What’s the best way to connect with others during a live sports game using a social platform?
- How can a real-time social platform be used to stay informed about entertainment news?
- Are premium social platforms for live events worth the subscription cost?
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.
A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.
<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/x.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/x.com.svg" alt="Overall score 37 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>