Back to the study

Wrigley

wrigley.com · Consumer goods

Ranked 1,072 of 2,047 companies in the study

32Overall score
  • Visibility16
  • Citations14
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Wrigley

AI assistants name Wrigley in 6.7% of answers, about twice as often as the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 32 out of 100, ranking 1,072nd of 2,047 companies. The website passes 1 of 14 technical checks for how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the consumer goods market: none named Wrigley. AI assistants named it in 4 of 60 answers (6.7%). The typical consumer goods company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Wrigley ranks 41 of 118 in its sector.

Named by AI in
6.7%
4 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
30.8%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
41 of 118
by overall score, where the typical consumer goods company scores 30
How Wrigley compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
16

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
14

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with consumer goods

118 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score32
Ranks 41 of 118. Typical company: 30
Named in answers7%
Ranks 41 of 118. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness21
Ranks 53 of 118. Typical company: 21
What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

“Is investing in bulk packs of chewing gum more cost-effective than buying single packs?”

Yes—bulk packs are usually more cost-effective than single packs, because the listed price per piece is lower in bulk listings than in individual packs.

Examples from the results show the difference clearly:

A single 14-piece pack of Orbit gum is listed at $1.98 on Walmart, or about 14.1¢ per piece.

A bulk 8-pack of 14-piece Orbit is listed at $10.59 on Target, which works out to about 9.5¢ per piece.

A 40-pack of Wrigley’s Juicy Fruit is listed at $16.99 on Walmart, about 42.5¢ per 5-stick pack.

Other bulk listings on …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Ice Breakers1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Wrigley
50.0%
Orbit Gum
25.0%
Ice Breakers
25.0%
Trident Gum
0.0%
Extra Gum
0.0%
5 Gum
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
OpenAI
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
Claude
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
80 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed

    SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
25 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPartly met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPNot met

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 32 of 100 · 100% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · www.mars.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

target.com
21
amazon.com
16
reddit.com
14
walmart.com
12
healthline.com
8
alibaba.com
8
tastingtable.com
6
colgate.com
6
yahoo.com
6
justdial.com
6

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (3 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What are the best non-candy snacks to satisfy a sweet craving?
  • Chewing gum versus mints: which lasts longer for breath freshening?
  • Why does some chewing gum become hard and lose flavor quickly?
  • Low-sugar candy alternatives for kids' lunchboxes?
  • How do hard candy and chewy candy compare for satisfying a sweet tooth?
  • Top-rated fruity candy options for family movie nights?
  • Is investing in bulk packs of chewing gum more cost-effective than buying single packs?
  • Which types of gum are least likely to stick to dental work?
  • What is the typical price range for chewing gum in convenience stores in the US?
  • Alternatives to chewing gum for freshening breath on the go?
  • Best chewing gum flavors for keeping focused during work or studying?
  • Are there significant price differences between sugar-free and regular candy options?
  • Types of candy suitable for filling a candy jar at the office?
  • Are sugar-free candies actually healthier than regular options?
  • What are the best sugar-free chewing gums for freshening breath?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 32 of 100 badge for Wrigley

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/wrigley.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/wrigley.com.svg" alt="Overall score 32 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo