Back to the study

WOW!

wowway.com · Telecom · WOW

Ranked 1,566 of 2,047 companies in the study

27Overall score
  • Visibility2
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness21
What this means for WOW!

AI assistants rarely name WOW! in market-related answers, appearing in 1 of 60 responses. For example, they sometimes name Xfinity or AT&T instead. WOW! has an overall score of 27 out of 100, ranking 1,566th of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the telecom market: none named WOW!. AI assistants named it in 1 of 60 answers (1.7%). The typical telecom company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, WOW! ranks 26 of 41 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
2.9%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
26 of 41
by overall score, where the typical telecom company scores 30
How WOW! compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
2

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with telecom

41 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score27
Ranks 26 of 41. Typical company: 30
Named in answers2%
Ranks 26 of 41. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness21
Ranks 21 of 41. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“Which residential broadband options offer whole-home WiFi coverage?”

The primary option for achieving whole-home WiFi coverage with residential broadband is through mesh WiFi systems. These systems are designed to eliminate dead zones and provide consistent, uninterrupted WiFi throughout your home.

Here's how mesh WiFi systems work and what to consider:

How they work: Unlike traditional routers that broadcast Wi-Fi from a single point, mesh WiFi systems use multiple access points, often called "nodes." A base router connects to your modem, and satellite extenders expand the coverage. These nodes communicate with each other to create a single, unifi …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Xfinity6AT&T4
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Xfinity
36.7%
Spectrum (Charter Communications)
30.0%
AT&T
30.0%
WOW!
3.3%
Cox Communications
0.0%
Mediacom
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
1/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
80 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed

    SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 28 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.wowway.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

justdial.com
44
highspeedinternet.com
32
broadbandnow.com
30
cnet.com
26
cabletv.com
22
astound.com
22
allconnect.com
21
reviews.org
20
spectrum.com
16
consumerreports.org
11

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Best broadband solutions for streaming 4K content on multiple devices
  • Best bundled internet and TV packages for remote work and streaming in the US
  • How do DSL and cable TV bundles differ for families?
  • Fiber vs cable internet for households with multiple streamers
  • Are there hidden fees to watch out for with residential broadband subscriptions?
  • What should I do if my broadband connection drops during video calls?
  • How can I improve home WiFi signal strength for online gaming?
  • How can I get reliable phone service without a landline bundle?
  • Alternatives to traditional cable TV for live sports and major networks
  • What are some options for households without access to wired high-speed internet?
  • Which internet service types work best for home-based online learning?
  • Which residential broadband options offer whole-home WiFi coverage?
  • Typical monthly costs for bundled internet, TV, and phone services in the US
  • Is upgrading to a gig-speed home internet plan worth the higher monthly cost?
  • Are unlimited data plans necessary for large households with smart devices?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo