Back to the study

Warby Parker

warbyparker.com · Retail · WRBY

Ranked 103 of 2,047 companies in the study

45Overall score
  • Visibility34
  • Citations3
  • Sentiment78
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness36
What this means for Warby Parker

AI assistants name Warby Parker in 38.3% of answers, much more often than the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 45 out of 100, ranking 103rd of 2,047 overall and 29th of 640 in its sector. The company’s website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named Warby Parker. AI assistants named it in 23 of 60 answers (38.3%). The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, Warby Parker ranks 53 of 640 in its sector.

Named by AI in
38.3%
23 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
27.4%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
29 of 640
by overall score, where the typical retail company scores 34
How Warby Parker compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
34

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
3

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
78

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
36

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with retail

640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score45
Ranks 29 of 640. Typical company: 34
Named in answers38%
Ranks 53 of 640. Typical company: 7%
AI readiness36
Ranks 156 of 640. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“Are budget-friendly online eyewear shops good for progressive lenses?”

Budget-friendly online eyewear shops can be a convenient and cost-effective option for progressive lenses, but there are important considerations to keep in mind. While online retailers often offer lower prices and a wider selection of frames, the success of progressive lenses heavily relies on precise measurements and fitting, which can be challenging to achieve online.

Here's a breakdown of the pros and cons:

Pros of Buying Progressive Lenses Online:

Lower Prices: Online retailers often have lower overhead costs, allowing them to offer progressive lenses at a fraction of the pr …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Zenni Optical22EyeBuyDirect14Felix Gray5
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Warby Parker
29.1%
GlassesUSA
24.1%
EyeBuyDirect
24.1%
Zenni Optical
19.0%
Felix Gray
3.8%
Liingo Eyewear
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
8/15
Perplexity
5/15
Claude
5/15
OpenAI
5/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Can an AI agent buy here?

Not by itself. Warby Parker publishes none of the purchase protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the checkout like a person.

  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 43 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.warbyparker.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 3 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespider*blocked
  • CCBot*blocked
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibot*blocked
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

zennioptical.com
29
eyebuydirect.com
22
healthline.com
22
forbes.com
20
glassesusa.com
18
warbyparker.com (its own website)
18
glasses.com
17
lenscrafters.com
17
allaboutvision.com
12
cnn.com
11

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (9 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Are budget-friendly online eyewear shops good for progressive lenses?
  • How to adjust frame arms on mail-order prescription glasses at home
  • Prescription sunglasses vs non-prescription sunglasses for daily driving
  • Is buying prescription glasses online worth it for first-time users?
  • Options for getting prescription lenses without shopping at a physical store
  • What should I do if my new eyeglasses don't fit well after ordering online?
  • What is the typical price range for prescription glasses online including lenses?
  • What are alternatives to online eyewear retailers for affordable vision correction?
  • How do shipping and return policies impact the total cost of ordering eyewear online?
  • Where can I get prescription sunglasses delivered quickly in the United States?
  • Most reliable websites to order prescription glasses in the US
  • Online eyewear retailer vs local optical shop: pros and cons
  • Best affordable online eyeglasses retailers with stylish frame choices
  • Other ways to buy contact lenses if you want to avoid traditional eyewear shops
  • Best online options for blue light filtering glasses for computer work
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 45 of 100 badge for Warby Parker

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/warbyparker.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/warbyparker.com.svg" alt="Overall score 45 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo