Back to the study

USA Today

usatoday.com · Media · GCI

Ranked 1,633 of 2,047 companies in the study

26Overall score
  • Visibility14
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality50
  • AI readiness36
What this means for USA Today

AI assistants name USA Today in 13.3% of answers, which is a little less often than the typical company in its sector, named in 15%. USA Today has an overall score of 26 out of 100, ranking 1,633rd of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 5 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the media market: none named USA Today. AI assistants named it in 8 of 60 answers (13.3%). The typical media company is named in 15.0% of answers. By how often it is named, USA Today ranks 51 of 99 in its sector.

Named by AI in
13.3%
8 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
14.8%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
5/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
87 of 99
by overall score, where the typical media company scores 36
How USA Today compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
14

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
50

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
36

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with media

99 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score26
Ranks 87 of 99. Typical company: 36
Named in answers13%
Ranks 51 of 99. Typical company: 15%
AI readiness36
Ranks 13 of 99. Typical company: 29
What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are some alternatives to using digital news sites for keeping up with current events in the U.S.?”

Do you mean avoiding web-based news sites specifically (e.g., news websites and apps) or avoiding the internet/digital sources entirely? I can tailor suggestions either way. Meanwhile, here are practical alternatives for keeping up with U.S. current events that aren’t primarily news websites:

1. Print newspapers and magazines

National papers: The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Washington Post (print editions).

Weeklies/monthlies: Time, The Atlantic, The New Yorker (for deeper analysis).

Pros: curated, fewer click-driven headlines; good for longform and context. …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
CNN13ABC News12CBS News2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

CNN
22.4%
Fox News
20.4%
USA Today
16.3%
ABC News
14.3%
CBS News
14.3%
NBC News
12.2%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

OpenAI
3/15
Gemini
2/15
Claude
2/15
Perplexity
1/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.usatoday.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 22 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBot*partly
  • ClaudeBot*blocked
  • Anthropic-AI*blocked
  • Google-Extended*partly
  • Applebot-Extended*blocked
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*blocked
  • FacebookBot*blocked
  • Bytespider*blocked
  • CCBot*blocked
  • Diffbot*blocked
  • Omgilibot*blocked
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBot*partly
  • Claude-SearchBot*blocked
  • PerplexityBot*partly
  • Applebot*blocked
  • Amazonbot*blocked
  • YouBot*blocked
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-User*partly
  • Claude-User*blocked
  • Perplexity-User*blocked
  • DuckAssistBot*blocked
  • MistralAI-User*blocked

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
18
pewresearch.org
15
apps.apple.com
13
studentbeans.com
13
reddit.com
11
wsj.com
9
americanpressinstitute.org
9
nytimes.com
9
weather.gov
9
apnews.com
8

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (7 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Do paid online news sites offer better content than free news platforms?
  • How do digital news publishers differ from traditional print newspapers in terms of news coverage?
  • What are some alternatives to using digital news sites for keeping up with current events in the U.S.?
  • Why am I seeing paywalls when trying to read digital news articles?
  • Typical monthly subscription prices for ad-free national news websites in the U.S.
  • How can I manage excessive notifications from national news websites on my phone?
  • Online news outlets vs cable news channels: Which is better for staying informed in the U.S.?
  • What’s the best way to follow live election coverage online in the U.S.?
  • Are there discounts for students on American online news subscriptions?
  • How can I access real-time local weather alerts from digital news publishers?
  • Best websites for breaking news about sports and entertainment in the United States
  • Where can I find up-to-date national news online for U.S. readers?
  • Is a digital news subscription worth the cost for daily national news updates?
  • Top sources for U.S. finance and technology news delivered online
  • Best ways to get breaking news updates without visiting news websites
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 26 of 100 badge for USA Today

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/usatoday.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/usatoday.com.svg" alt="Overall score 26 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo