- Visibility10
- Citations0
- Sentiment50
- Site quality80
- AI readiness29
AI assistants name Ubiquiti in 8.3% of answers, slightly less often than the typical company in the Technology sector. Its overall score is 30 out of 100, ranking 1,213th of 2,047 companies in the study. The company’s website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the technology market: none named Ubiquiti. AI assistants named it in 5 of 60 answers (8.3%). The typical technology company is named in 10.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Ubiquiti ranks 151 of 273 in its sector.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
273 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
An answer that names the company
“Are there hidden fees with license-free cloud-managed network solutions?”
While "license-free" cloud-managed network solutions aim to reduce recurring costs, it's important to be aware of potential hidden fees. Many providers offer "free tiers" or "license-free" options, but these can come with limitations or other charges.
Here's a breakdown of potential hidden costs:
1. Data Transfer and Egress Fees:
Egress fees are charges for data leaving the cloud provider's network (e.g., delivering content to end-users, moving data between regions, or syncing with on-premises systems). These can represent a significant portion of total cloud costs, especially fo …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.
- Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
- study: 86.8%SitemapPassed
An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPassed
Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 32 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · ui.com · 2,047 companies scanned
4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
This website sets rules for 8 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.
- GPTBot*allowed
- ClaudeBot*allowed
- Anthropic-AIallowed
- Google-Extended*allowed
- Applebot-Extended*allowed
- Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
- FacebookBotallowed
- Bytespiderallowed
- CCBot*allowed
- Diffbotallowed
- Omgilibotallowed
- OAI-SearchBot*allowed
- Claude-SearchBotallowed
- PerplexityBot*allowed
- Applebotallowed
- Amazonbotallowed
- YouBotallowed
- ChatGPT-User*allowed
- Claude-Userallowed
- Perplexity-Userallowed
- DuckAssistBotallowed
- MistralAI-Userallowed
Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as US-listed.
- Are there hidden fees with license-free cloud-managed network solutions?
- How to resolve access control problems in unified network and security systems
- Cloud-managed vs on-premise enterprise networking: key differences and benefits
- How do license-free network infrastructures compare to subscription-based solutions?
- Is investing in an all-in-one enterprise network and security hardware platform worth it for mid-sized businesses?
- Best non-subscription models for enterprise IT infrastructure
- Best networking solutions for organizations requiring remote cloud access and physical site security
- Alternative approaches to unified site management in enterprise networks
- Common issues when scaling enterprise wireless networks across multiple sites
- How to deploy integrated switching, WiFi, and security hardware for educational campuses
- What are the best enterprise networking systems for multi-site organizations?
- Are intuitive, unified management dashboards a must-have for modern network infrastructure?
- Alternatives to cloud-managed enterprise networking for businesses wanting full local control
- Typical costs for enterprise networking and security hardware bundles in the US
- Top options for integrated network and physical security management platforms
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.
A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.
<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/ui.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/ui.com.svg" alt="Overall score 30 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>