Back to the study

Threads

threads.com · Media

Ranked 1,024 of 2,047 companies in the study

32Overall score
  • Visibility16
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment70
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness14
What this means for Threads

AI assistants name Threads in 18.3% of answers, more often than the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 32 out of 100, ranking 1,024th of 2,047 companies. Threads' website passes 1 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the media market: none named Threads. AI assistants named it in 11 of 60 answers (18.3%). The typical media company is named in 15.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Threads ranks 44 of 99 in its sector.

Named by AI in
18.3%
11 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
11.8%
compared with 4 rivals
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
56 of 99
by overall score, where the typical media company scores 36
How Threads compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
16

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
70

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with media

99 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score32
Ranks 56 of 99. Typical company: 36
Named in answers18%
Ranks 44 of 99. Typical company: 15%
AI readiness14
Ranks 78 of 99. Typical company: 29
What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

“How do discussion-based social platforms compare to image-focused social apps?”

Here’s a focused comparison between discussion-based social platforms (text- and conversation-centered — e.g., forums, Reddit, long-form comment threads) and image-focused social apps (visual-first — e.g., Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest). I’ll cover goals, user behavior, product design implications, strengths, weaknesses, risks, and which use-cases suit each.

1) Core purpose and user intent

Discussion-based: Built around conversation, debate, information exchange, Q&A, and longer-form viewpoints. Users often seek knowledge, opinions, or community interaction.

Image-focused: Built to show vi …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Reddit34Mastodon15Bluesky8
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Reddit
37.5%
Twitter (X)
22.7%
Mastodon
17.0%
Threads
12.5%
Bluesky
10.2%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
3/15
Claude
3/15
OpenAI
3/15
Gemini
2/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Can an AI agent buy here?

Not by itself. Threads publishes none of the purchase protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the checkout like a person.

  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
41 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 16 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.threads.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

apps.apple.com
44
mightynetworks.com
9
circle.so
8
buffer.com
7
play.google.com
7
medium.com
7
techcrunch.com
6
alternativeto.net
6
reddit.com
6
socialrails.com
5

In the study as Consumer brands. One of the most visited websites in the United States (Similarweb, August 2026). A Meta brand.

Every question, and where the company came up (7 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How do discussion-based social platforms compare to image-focused social apps?
  • Is it worthwhile to join a new social app for sharing questions and short posts?
  • What are the best social networking apps for connecting with communities in the US?
  • How do people use social networking apps to find like-minded communities in the US?
  • Are there free social networking platforms for sharing ideas and connecting with others?
  • Which apps let you join conversations and share thoughts besides traditional social media?
  • What are effective ways to ask questions or get advice on social community apps?
  • How can I recover access if I forget my password on a new social discussion app?
  • What subscription tiers are common for social apps that focus on conversations and communities?
  • Which social apps make it easy to share ideas and random thoughts with others?
  • Are private social networking apps worth signing up for to meet new people online?
  • Why can’t I log in to a social networking app using my existing account details?
  • Community-driven social networks vs microblogging platforms—what’s the difference?
  • What are some alternatives to discussion-based social platforms for online connection?
  • Best alternatives to microblogging platforms for real-time community discussions?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 32 of 100 badge for Threads

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/threads.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/threads.com.svg" alt="Overall score 32 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo