Back to the study

TG Therapeutics

tgtherapeutics.com · Healthcare · TGTX

Ranked 1,773 of 2,047 companies in the study

26Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness29
What this means for TG Therapeutics

AI assistants do not name TG Therapeutics in any of their answers to 60 questions about the market. Its overall score is 26 out of 100, ranking 1,773rd of 2,047 companies. The company's website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the healthcare market: none named TG Therapeutics. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical healthcare company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, TG Therapeutics ranks 69 of 105 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
81 of 105
by overall score, where the typical healthcare company scores 31
How TG Therapeutics compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with healthcare

105 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score26
Ranks 81 of 105. Typical company: 31
Named in answers0%
Ranks 69 of 105. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness29
Ranks 24 of 105. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“How do infusion therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis compare to oral medications?”

For relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), both infusion therapies and oral medications are used as disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) to help manage symptoms, reduce relapses, and slow disease progression. They work by modifying the immune system's response that causes MS attacks. The choice between infusion and oral treatments depends on various factors, including efficacy, side effect profiles, frequency of administration, and patient convenience.

Here's a comparison of infusion therapies and oral medications for relapsing MS:

Infusion Therapies

Administration: Medications are de …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Roche / Genentech (Ocrevus)
60.0%
EMD Serono (Merck KGaA) – Mavenclad
26.7%
Novartis (Gilenya & Kesimpta)
6.7%
Sanofi (Aubagio)
6.7%
TG Therapeutics
0.0%
Biogen
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

Not by itself. TG Therapeutics publishes none of the purchase protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the checkout like a person.

  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present

The shop runs on WooCommerce.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.tgtherapeutics.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
147
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
30
my.clevelandclinic.org
27
nationalmssociety.org
27
mymsaa.org
22
mayoclinic.org
17
mymsteam.com
16
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
16
neurology.org
15
mstrust.org.uk
12

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Are there non-pharmacological alternatives to traditional disease-modifying therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis?
  • Is starting a newer disease-modifying therapy for relapsing MS worth the potential risks?
  • How to manage common side effects of disease-modifying therapies for relapsing MS
  • How do infusion therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis compare to oral medications?
  • What should I consider before switching MS treatments for relapsing forms of the disease?
  • Are certain therapies better suited for older adults with relapsing multiple sclerosis?
  • Which treatment approaches are suitable for highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis?
  • What are the most promising new treatment options for relapsing multiple sclerosis in the US?
  • Injectable versus oral disease-modifying treatments for relapsing multiple sclerosis—what are the key differences?
  • What are the main options besides medication for managing relapsing MS symptoms?
  • Best therapies for newly diagnosed relapsing multiple sclerosis patients
  • What is the typical out-of-pocket cost for disease-modifying therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis in the US?
  • How can uninsured patients access affordable medications for relapsing MS?
  • Where can patients in the US find clinical trials for new relapsing multiple sclerosis treatments?
  • What can I do if my current therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis isn’t controlling my symptoms?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo