Back to the study

Stanley Black & Decker

stanleyblackanddecker.com · Industrial · SWK

Ranked 1,927 of 2,047 companies in the study

24Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Stanley Black & Decker

AI assistants do not name Stanley Black & Decker in any of their 60 answers, while the typical company in its sector is named in 5% of answers. It has an overall score of 24 out of 100, ranking 1,927th of 2,047 companies. The company's website passes 3 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Stanley Black & Decker. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Stanley Black & Decker ranks 191 of 246 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
226 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How Stanley Black & Decker compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score24
Ranks 226 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers0%
Ranks 191 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness21
Ranks 107 of 246. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“Alternatives to pneumatic tools for heavy-duty fastening projects”

For heavy-duty fastening projects, several alternatives to pneumatic tools offer comparable power, precision, and efficiency. These alternatives often provide benefits like increased portability, reduced noise, and less maintenance.

Here are the main alternatives:

Hydraulic Tools Hydraulic tools are excellent for high-torque, heavy-duty applications. They use hydraulic pressure to deliver accurate and consistent force, making them ideal for tasks like tightening large bolts in industries such as oil and gas, and power generation.

Examples: Hydraulic impact wrenches, hydra …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
DeWalt8
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

DeWalt
83.3%
RIDGID Tools
16.7%
Stanley Black & Decker
0.0%
Makita USA
0.0%
Bosch Tools USA
0.0%
Milwaukee Tool
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
72 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPartly met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 24 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.stanleyblackanddecker.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

bobvila.com
22
justdial.com
19
youtube.com
17
reddit.com
15
lowes.com
14
homedepot.com
13
slashgear.com
11
protoolreviews.com
10
popularmechanics.com
10
mensjournal.com
9

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Alternatives to pneumatic tools for heavy-duty fastening projects
  • Are premium-priced power tools worth the investment for occasional DIY use?
  • Best hand tools for electrical work and wiring repairs
  • Cordless vs corded power tools—what are the main advantages and drawbacks?
  • Common problems with battery-powered drill performance and how to fix them
  • What are the best power tool sets for home improvement projects?
  • Essential power tools for starting a woodworking workshop
  • What are some substitute tools for a bench grinder in metalworking tasks?
  • Typical price ranges for high-quality mechanic hand tool sets in the US
  • Top hand tools every professional tradesperson should have in their toolbox
  • Options for multi-purpose power tools for small workshops
  • How do industrial-grade hand tools compare to consumer-grade options in terms of durability?
  • How do prices for professional power tools compare to entry-level models?
  • What should I do if my circular saw blade keeps binding during cuts?
  • Should I invest in a complete mechanic tool set or buy individual tools separately?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo