Back to the study

Sempra

sempra.com · Energy · SRE

Ranked 1,423 of 2,047 companies in the study

28Overall score
  • Visibility5
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Sempra

AI assistants rarely name Sempra, mentioning it in 2 out of 60 answers. Its overall score is 28 out of 100, which ranks 1,423rd of 2,047 companies. The website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the energy market: none named Sempra. AI assistants named it in 2 of 60 answers (3.3%). The typical energy company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Sempra ranks 52 of 109 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
3.3%
2 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
6.9%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
59 of 109
by overall score, where the typical energy company scores 29
How Sempra compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
5

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with energy

109 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score28
Ranks 59 of 109. Typical company: 29
Named in answers3%
Ranks 52 of 109. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness21
Ranks 52 of 109. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“Which utility providers offer specialized solutions for multifamily housing energy needs?”

Many utility providers and energy service companies offer specialized solutions for the energy needs of multifamily housing. These solutions often focus on improving energy efficiency, reducing operating costs, and increasing tenant comfort.

Some key providers and programs include:

RISE Engineering is a large multifamily services provider in New England and New York, offering energy assessments and upgrades for apartments and condominiums. They work with electric and gas utilities like Cape Light Compact, Eversource, Liberty Utilities, National Grid, and Unitil, acting as a Mass Save …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

PG&E Corporation
50.0%
Southern Company
29.2%
Sempra
8.3%
Duke Energy
8.3%
Dominion Energy
4.2%
NextEra Energy
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
1/15
Gemini
1/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
72 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPartly met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 24 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · sempra.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

energy.gov
25
chooseenergy.com
17
aceee.org
14
electricchoice.com
13
eia.gov
10
aga.org
7
energysage.com
7
constellation.com
7
choosetexaspower.org
7
mass.gov
6

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (2 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Best non-utility options for affordable energy supply in metropolitan areas
  • How to report safety concerns about my local energy infrastructure?
  • Is it worth switching to a utility company specializing in large-scale infrastructure?
  • What are alternatives to traditional utility companies for safe and reliable energy?
  • Which utility providers offer specialized solutions for multifamily housing energy needs?
  • What are the best energy providers for reliable service in Texas and California?
  • How do regional power providers differ from national energy networks for commercial customers?
  • Are regional energy networks providing better pricing than municipal utilities?
  • Top-rated utility companies for affordable electricity in the western United States
  • Typical energy rates for residential customers in California and Texas
  • What should I do if my power service is unreliable or frequently interrupted?
  • How does energy from natural gas infrastructure compare to renewable energy networks in reliability?
  • Electricity vs natural gas utilities for residential energy needs: which is safer and more cost-effective?
  • What are the best energy options for powering large industrial facilities in the US?
  • How do delivery and service charges work on most US utility bills?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo