Back to the study

SeatGeek

seatgeek.com · Retail

Ranked 943 of 2,047 companies in the study

33Overall score
  • Visibility34
  • Citations6
  • Sentiment76
  • Site quality33
  • AI readiness7
What this means for SeatGeek

AI assistants name SeatGeek in 43.3% of answers, much more often than the typical company in retail. Its overall score is 33 out of 100, ranking 943rd of 2,047 companies in the study. The website passes 1 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named SeatGeek. AI assistants named it in 26 of 60 answers (43.3%). The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, SeatGeek ranks 35 of 640 in its sector.

Named by AI in
43.3%
26 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
21.1%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
327 of 640
by overall score, where the typical retail company scores 34
How SeatGeek compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
34

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
6

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
76

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
33

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
7

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with retail

640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score33
Ranks 327 of 640. Typical company: 34
Named in answers43%
Ranks 35 of 640. Typical company: 7%
AI readiness7
Ranks 570 of 640. Typical company: 29
What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

“How do mobile-first ticket marketplaces compare to traditional box office websites?”

I'll search for information comparing mobile-first ticket marketplaces to traditional box office websites.Based on the search results, here's how mobile-first ticket marketplaces compare to traditional box office websites:

Convenience & Accessibility

Smartphones provide consumers with anytime, anywhere access to movie listings and ticket booking, allowing users to browse options, select seats, and purchase tickets on-the-go without needing to visit physical box offices or use desktop computers. Mobile apps create a digital shopping mall on-the-go, where consumers can conduct transactions …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Ticketmaster21StubHub17Vivid Seats12AXS8TickPick3
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Ticketmaster
25.4%
SeatGeek
22.0%
StubHub
20.3%
Vivid Seats
14.4%
AXS
11.0%
TickPick
6.8%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
9/15
Claude
6/15
OpenAI
6/15
Perplexity
5/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Can an AI agent buy here?

Not by itself. SeatGeek publishes none of the purchase protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the checkout like a person.

  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 36 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · seatgeek.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • Not metToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

seatgeek.com (its own website)
32
tickpick.com
28
karlobag.eu
16
forbes.com
15
reddit.com
14
help.ticketmaster.com
12
freshtix.com
9
usatoday.com
9
gametime.co
7
nypost.com
7

In the study as US retailers: listed as a retailer in Wikidata, a public database, and among the websites Cloudflare Radar ranks as visited.

Every question, and where the company came up (13 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How do mobile-first ticket marketplaces compare to traditional box office websites?
  • Where can I find theater tickets for popular shows in major US cities?
  • How do service fees and delivery charges work with most US ticket marketplaces?
  • Is it better to buy event tickets early or closer to the event date for the best prices?
  • How do mobile event ticketing services make attending sold-out games possible?
  • What’s the difference between peer-to-peer ticket resale sites and direct ticket sellers for sports events?
  • How can I resolve an issue with not receiving my electronic tickets after purchase?
  • Options for finding last-minute deals on event tickets without using resale platforms
  • Alternatives to using digital ticket marketplaces for sports events
  • What should I do if my ticket QR code won't scan at the venue entrance?
  • Best online ticketing platforms for last-minute concert tickets in the US
  • What are other ways to get verified tickets for high-demand concerts?
  • Typical price range for floor seats at major concerts booked online
  • What’s the process for selling extra theater tickets safely online?
  • Are digital tickets for live events worth the service fees charged by online ticket exchanges?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 33 of 100 badge for SeatGeek

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/seatgeek.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/seatgeek.com.svg" alt="Overall score 33 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo