Back to the study

Sanmina

sanmina.com · Industrial · SANM

Ranked 1,136 of 2,047 companies in the study

31Overall score
  • Visibility10
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment75
  • Site quality67
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Sanmina

AI assistants name Sanmina in 6.7% of answers, a bit more often than the typical company in its sector at 5%. Its overall score is 31 out of 100, ranking 1,136th of 2,047 companies in the study. The company's website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Sanmina. AI assistants named it in 4 of 60 answers (6.7%). The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Sanmina ranks 97 of 246 in its sector.

Named by AI in
6.7%
4 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
14.8%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
123 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How Sanmina compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
10

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
75

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
67

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score31
Ranks 123 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers7%
Ranks 97 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness21
Ranks 107 of 246. Typical company: 21
What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are the best electronic manufacturing services for OEMs in the medical device sector?”

I'll search for information about the best electronic manufacturing services for OEMs in the medical device sector.Based on current market information, here are the best electronic manufacturing services for OEMs in the medical device sector:

Leading Global EMS Providers

Jabil and Flex bring broad global scale; Phillips-Medisize, Integer, and Viant offer deep device-development and manufacturing specialization; Sanmina is strong in complex electronics.

Sanmina is particularly noteworthy as a globally renowned EMS giant and leading medical PCB manufacturing company in the United State …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Flex3Jabil3Benchmark Electronics3Celestica2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Sanmina
18.2%
Flex
18.2%
Jabil
18.2%
Plexus Corp.
18.2%
Benchmark Electronics
13.6%
Celestica
13.6%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

OpenAI
2/15
Claude
1/15
Gemini
1/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

We could not tell. The website turned away our requests for the files an agent would read. An agent arriving by itself is turned away the same way.

  • UCPCould not check
  • ACPCould not check
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPCould not check

The shop runs on WooCommerce.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthCould not check

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogCould not check

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryCould not check

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceCould not check

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardCould not check

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsCould not check

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPNot met

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestCould not check

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 35 of 100 · 68% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · www.sanmina.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

globenewswire.com
16
finance.yahoo.com
12
aeicm.com
10
dataintelo.com
9
linkedin.com
9
siemens.com
7
ttelectronics.com
7
foxtronicsems.com
6
justdial.com
6
versae.com
5

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (2 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How do OEMs in the United States benefit from repair and after-market support services in the electronics supply chain?
  • Alternatives to integrated EMS providers for cloud computing hardware needs?
  • Do integrated design and manufacturing services add value for automotive electronics projects?
  • What are the best electronic manufacturing services for OEMs in the medical device sector?
  • Use cases for end-to-end logistics solutions in communications equipment manufacturing?
  • What factors influence pricing for custom electronics manufacturing projects in the US?
  • How to address quality control issues in electronics manufacturing for defense applications?
  • Top integrated supply chain solutions for aerospace equipment manufacturers?
  • How does contract manufacturing differ from full-service EMS in electronics production?
  • Typical cost differences between domestic and offshore electronic assembly for industrial applications?
  • Is outsourcing electronics manufacturing worth it for small volume industrial OEMs?
  • What are some other supply chain management solutions available for high-complexity electronics manufacturing?
  • Pros and cons of using a vertically integrated manufacturer versus separate design and build partners?
  • What are common challenges when scaling up cloud infrastructure hardware assembly with EMS partners?
  • Which US providers offer rapid prototyping and NPI services for high-tech OEMs?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 31 of 100 badge for Sanmina

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/sanmina.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/sanmina.com.svg" alt="Overall score 31 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo