Back to the study

SAFE Collecting Supplies

safepub.com · Retail

Ranked 1,180 of 2,047 companies in the study

31Overall score
  • Visibility4
  • Citations5
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness57
What this means for SAFE Collecting Supplies

AI assistants rarely name SAFE Collecting Supplies. They name this company in 1 of 60 answers. Its overall score is 31 out of 100, ranking 1,180th of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 8 of 14 technical checks for how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named SAFE Collecting Supplies. AI assistants named it in 1 of 60 answers (1.7%). The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, SAFE Collecting Supplies ranks 431 of 640 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
8.3%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
8/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
386 of 640
by overall score, where the typical retail company scores 34
How SAFE Collecting Supplies compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
4

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
5

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
57

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with retail

640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score31
Ranks 386 of 640. Typical company: 34
Named in answers2%
Ranks 431 of 640. Typical company: 7%
AI readiness57
Ranks 79 of 640. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are the best archival-quality albums for stamp collectors?”

For stamp collectors, choosing archival-quality albums is crucial for preserving the collection's long-term value and condition. Archival materials are specifically manufactured to be chemically stable, pH-neutral, and inert, preventing degradation over time.

Here are the key characteristics and brands to consider for archival-quality stamp albums:

Key Characteristics of Archival-Quality Albums:

pH-Neutral and Lignin-Free Pages: The paper used in album pages should be acid-free with a neutral pH (at least 7.0) and lignin-free. Lignin is a wood pulp component that breaks down into …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Lighthouse Publications (LightHouse US)
85.7%
SAFE Collecting Supplies
14.3%
Scott Collectors Supply (Amos Advantage)
0.0%
Supersafe Brand Products (Subway Stamp Shop)
0.0%
Columbian Collectors Supplies
0.0%
Brookman Stamp Company & MHA
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
1/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

Yes. SAFE Collecting Supplies publishes a UCP profile, a file that tells an AI agent how to buy, and it includes checkout.

  • UCPPublished
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present

The shop runs on Shopify.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
20 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPassed

    OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourcePassed

    Metadata telling agents which authorization server to use.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 43 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.safepub.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

8 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • PassedMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

safepub.com (its own website)
25
reddit.com
17
alibaba.com
13
planetbanknote.com
11
universityproducts.com
8
bcwsupplies.com
8
stampscan.app
7
archivalmethods.com
7
en.wikipedia.org
7
youtube.com
7

In the study as US retailers: listed as a retailer in Wikidata, a public database, and among the websites Cloudflare Radar ranks as visited.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What are some alternatives to traditional albums for storing collectible stamps?
  • Which non-album solutions are best for long-term coin preservation?
  • Are premium coin folders worth the investment for serious collectors?
  • Do acid-free pages really make a difference for long-term stamp preservation?
  • What’s the difference between modular collectors’ cabinets and binders for memorabilia organization?
  • How can I prevent my collectible banknotes from yellowing in storage?
  • How much should I expect to pay for archival-quality storage supplies for a medium-sized collection?
  • Which storage solutions work well for organizing rare coins?
  • What should I do if my stamp album pages start sticking together?
  • What are the best archival-quality albums for stamp collectors?
  • How do archival storage pages compare to plastic sleeves for preserving currency?
  • How can postcard collectors safely display and store their collections at home?
  • Are higher-priced currency holders better at protecting against humidity and fading?
  • What is the best way to organize a growing pin collection for easy display and access?
  • What organizational options exist for collectors who want to store both coins and paper currency together?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo