- Visibility3
- Citations0
- Sentiment50
- Site quality80
- AI readiness64
AI assistants rarely name Fox Factory, mentioning it in 1 of 60 answers. RockShox and King Shocks are also mentioned in the same answer. Its overall score is 31 out of 100, ranking 1,178th of 2,047 companies. The website passes 9 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the automotive market: none named Fox Factory. AI assistants named it in 1 of 60 answers (1.7%). The typical automotive company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Fox Factory ranks 30 of 49 in its sector.
Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
49 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
An answer that names the company
“What is the average price range for high-end suspension forks for bicycles?”
Short answer: for modern mountain bikes, “high-end” suspension forks typically cost about $800–$2,000 new.
More detail and context:
Upper‑end trail / enduro forks (Fox Factory, RockShox Ultimate/RC2 level, etc.): roughly $800–$1,600.
Top‑tier DH (downhill) or race‑spec forks and limited/collector models: about $1,200–$2,000+.
Mid‑range performance forks: roughly $350–$800.
Entry/entry‑performance: under $350 (often lower‑spec air or coil forks).
What drives price
Damping hardware and adjustability (multiple compression/rebound circuits, EVOL chambers, tokens).
Stanchion …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.
- Content Signals
Yes. Fox Factory publishes a UCP profile, a file that tells an AI agent how to buy, and it includes checkout.
- UCPPublished
- ACPNot present
- AP2Not present
- x402Not present
- MPPNot present
The page also offers an agent tools inside the browser: add to cart, proceed to checkout, update cart lines.
The shop runs on Shopify.
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
- study: 86.8%SitemapPassed
An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtPassed
An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPartly met
Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryPassed
OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourcePassed
Metadata telling agents which authorization server to use.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPPassed
Tools registered in the browser through navigator.modelContext.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 45 of 100 · 100% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · ridefox.com · 2,047 companies scanned
9 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- PassedMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- PassedWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.
- GPTBotpartly
- ClaudeBotpartly
- Anthropic-AIpartly
- Google-Extendedpartly
- Applebot-Extendedpartly
- Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
- FacebookBotpartly
- Bytespiderpartly
- CCBotpartly
- Diffbotpartly
- Omgilibotpartly
- OAI-SearchBotpartly
- Claude-SearchBotpartly
- PerplexityBotpartly
- Applebotpartly
- Amazonbotpartly
- YouBotpartly
- ChatGPT-Userpartly
- Claude-Userpartly
- Perplexity-Userpartly
- DuckAssistBotpartly
- MistralAI-Userpartly
Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as Consumer brands.
- Is upgrading mountain bike suspension worth it for cross-country riding?
- Internal bypass shocks vs. monotube shocks: which performs better in desert racing?
- Are premium vehicle suspension upgrades worth the investment for weekend racers?
- How much should I budget for a full suspension upgrade on a pickup truck?
- What are the best high-performance suspension systems for mountain bikes used in aggressive trail riding?
- Which type of vehicle suspension is best for both daily driving and occasional off-roading?
- How do adjustable coilover suspensions compare to air suspension systems for off-road vehicles?
- What are some alternatives to coil spring suspension for off-road applications?
- Why is my mountain bike suspension making a clunking noise over rough terrain?
- What are the top-rated performance shocks for overlanding in the US?
- Are there lightweight suspension options suitable for road cycling?
- What is the average price range for high-end suspension forks for bicycles?
- What features should I look for in high-performance UTV suspension systems?
- What type of suspension system is recommended for downhill biking?
- How can I fix excessive sag in my vehicle’s rear suspension?
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.