Back to the study

Reynolds Consumer Products

reynoldsconsumerproducts.com · Unclassified · REYN

Ranked 1,998 of 2,047 companies in the study

22Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality67
  • AI readiness14
What this means for Reynolds Consumer Products

AI assistants do not name Reynolds Consumer Products in any of their 60 answers. The company has an overall score of 22 out of 100, ranking 1,998th of 2,047 in the study. Its website passes 2 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market: none named Reynolds Consumer Products. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical company in its group is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Reynolds Consumer Products ranks 41 of 61 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
58 of 61
by overall score, where the typical company scores 29
How Reynolds Consumer Products compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
67

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with its group

61 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score22
Ranks 58 of 61. Typical company: 29
Named in answers0%
Ranks 41 of 61. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness14
Ranks 43 of 61. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“What is the average price range for bulk packs of kitchen trash bags?”

For bulk packs of 13-gallon kitchen trash bags, the average price range is typically between $19.00 and $23.00 for 120 to 200 bags. This often breaks down to an average cost of $0.10 to $0.19 per bag.

Here's a breakdown of prices from popular retailers:

Costco Kirkland Signature Flex-Tech 13-gallon kitchen trash bags are priced around $16.99 for 200 bags, which comes out to about $0.08 per bag. They also offer scented versions at a similar price.

Sam's Club offers various brands like Member's Mark, Hefty, and Glad.

Member's Mark Power Flex 13-gallon, 200-count bags are …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Glad
71.4%
Up & Up (Target Store Brand)
28.6%
Reynolds Consumer Products
0.0%
Ziploc
0.0%
GladWare
0.0%
Great Value (Walmart Brand)
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
41 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 16 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.reynoldsconsumerproducts.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

amazon.com
28
target.com
23
reddit.com
15
walmart.com
13
glad.com
13
homedepot.com
11
justdial.com
11
alibaba.com
10
nytimes.com
9
youtube.com
8

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Do premium food storage containers keep leftovers fresher than basic ones?
  • Do reusable food storage containers save money compared to disposables?
  • Which disposable tableware is best for outdoor picnics?
  • Best way to stop trash bags from slipping inside the bin?
  • What is the average price range for bulk packs of kitchen trash bags?
  • Recommended heavy-duty garbage bags for yard cleanups?
  • What are the best types of trash bags for large households?
  • Good options for organizing snacks in kids' lunchboxes?
  • Is it worth buying scented kitchen trash bags?
  • Difference between drawstring and flap-tie garbage bags?
  • Most convenient disposable tableware for busy families?
  • Non-plastic options for storing leftovers in the fridge?
  • Alternatives to plastic food storage bags for eco-friendly households?
  • How to prevent food storage bags from leaking or tearing?
  • Disposable plastic plates vs compostable options for parties?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo