Back to the study

PriceSmart

pricesmart.com · Unclassified · PSMT

Ranked 1,844 of 2,047 companies in the study

25Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness29
What this means for PriceSmart

AI assistants do not name PriceSmart in any of their answers to everyday market questions. Its overall score is 25 out of 100, ranking 1,844th of 2,047 companies, which is below the typical company in its group. The website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market: none named PriceSmart. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical company in its group is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, PriceSmart ranks 41 of 61 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 4 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
46 of 61
by overall score, where the typical company scores 29
How PriceSmart compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with its group

61 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score25
Ranks 46 of 61. Typical company: 29
Named in answers0%
Ranks 41 of 61. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness29
Ranks 15 of 61. Typical company: 21
What Claude actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“What are the top benefits of wholesale club memberships for frequent bulk shoppers?”

I can provide you with comprehensive information about wholesale club memberships based on my general knowledge.

Top Benefits of Wholesale Club Memberships for Frequent Bulk Shoppers:

1. Lower Per-Unit Prices: Wholesale clubs buy in massive quantities and pass savings directly to members. This is especially valuable for frequently purchased items like groceries, household supplies, and toiletries.

2. Bulk Purchasing Options: Members can buy larger quantities upfront, which is ideal if you have storage space and consume items regularly. This reduces the frequency of shopping trip …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
Costco21Sam’s Club9Boxed5BJ’s Wholesale Club1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Costco
40.0%
Sam’s Club
37.6%
BJ’s Wholesale Club
11.8%
Boxed
10.6%
PriceSmart
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthCould not check

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogCould not check

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryCould not check

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceCould not check

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 29 of 100 · 83% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.pricesmart.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 14 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBot*blocked
  • ClaudeBot*blocked
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extended*blocked
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*partly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespider*blocked
  • CCBot*blocked
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBot*partly
  • Claude-SearchBot*blocked
  • PerplexityBot*partly
  • Applebot*partly
  • Amazonbot*blocked
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-User*partly
  • Claude-User*blocked
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBot*blocked
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

bjs.com
25
reviewed.com
21
aarp.org
21
sofi.com
13
reddit.com
11
foxbusiness.com
9
supermarketnews.com
9
thestreet.com
8
discover.texasrealfood.com
8
facebook.com
7

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What are the top benefits of wholesale club memberships for frequent bulk shoppers?
  • Are there alternatives to warehouse club memberships for buying in bulk without a yearly fee?
  • How do warehouse-style club stores compare to traditional grocery stores for bulk shopping?
  • What are some smart ways families can use a wholesale membership to save on groceries and household products?
  • Is joining a membership-based wholesale club worth it for single-person households?
  • Which wholesale clubs offer the widest range of household essentials for value-focused shoppers?
  • How do product prices at membership-based clubs generally compare to regular supermarkets?
  • What can I do if my wholesale club delivery arrives with missing items?
  • How do you handle membership renewal issues at warehouse clubs?
  • What are the best ways to save money shopping at membership-based wholesale clubs in the US?
  • Are online wholesale memberships better than in-store club memberships for families?
  • How can small businesses take advantage of wholesale club memberships for office supplies?
  • What are some good options for accessing wholesale prices on groceries without joining a club?
  • What is the typical membership fee range for US wholesale clubs, and are there discounts for first-time members?
  • What’s the best way to find exclusive deals on bulk items outside of membership clubs?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo