Back to the study

Pentair

pentair.com · Industrial · PNR

Ranked 1,259 of 2,047 companies in the study

30Overall score
  • Visibility7
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness29
What this means for Pentair

AI assistants rarely name Pentair, with only 1 of 60 answers mentioning the company. Its overall score is 30 out of 100, ranking 1,259th of 2,047, similar to the typical company in its sector. The website passes 3 of 14 technical checks that measure how ready the site is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Pentair. AI assistants named it in 1 of 60 answers (1.7%). The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Pentair ranks 159 of 246 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
14.3%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
135 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How Pentair compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
7

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score30
Ranks 135 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers2%
Ranks 159 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness29
Ranks 34 of 246. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“Top-rated home water filtration systems for municipal water in the US”

For homes with municipal water in the U.S., several top-rated water filtration systems are available, including whole-house, under-sink, and countertop options. These systems address common concerns like chlorine, chloramine, disinfection byproducts, and emerging contaminants like PFAS and microplastics.

Here's a breakdown of top-rated systems by type:

Whole House Water Filtration Systems

Whole-house systems filter water at the point it enters your home, providing treated water to every tap.

SpringWell CF1: This system is highly recommended for city water, particularly for reduc …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Culligan2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Pentair
50.0%
Culligan
50.0%
A. O. Smith
0.0%
Evoqua Water Technologies
0.0%
Watts Water Technologies
0.0%
Kinetico
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
1/15
Perplexity
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthCould not check

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogCould not check

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryCould not check

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceCould not check

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 29 of 100 · 83% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.pentair.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

culligan.com
19
waterfilterguru.com
15
softprowatersystems.com
13
epa.gov
12
qualitywatertreatment.com
8
frizzlife.com
8
justdial.com
7
qualitywaterlab.com
7
aquasana.com
7
modernize.com
6

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Whole house water filter vs under-sink filter: which is better for families?
  • How to diagnose low water pressure after installing a new filtration setup?
  • Typical price range for installing a whole house water filtration system in the US
  • Are advanced water monitoring systems necessary for residential properties?
  • Eco-friendly alternatives to conventional water filtration systems?
  • Is investing in a smart water softener system worth it for a small business?
  • What options exist besides reverse osmosis for improving well water quality?
  • Difference between reverse osmosis and UV water purification systems?
  • Alternatives to traditional salt-based water softeners
  • What causes sediment buildup in water treatment systems and how do you fix it?
  • Best water solutions for industrial facilities with high daily usage needs
  • What are the best water management solutions for large commercial buildings?
  • Top-rated home water filtration systems for municipal water in the US
  • Are there affordable options for commercial water softeners?
  • How can sustainable water systems help reduce utility costs in hotels?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo