Back to the study

Penguin Random House

penguinrandomhouse.com · Media

Ranked 1,754 of 2,047 companies in the study

26Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Penguin Random House

AI assistants do not name Penguin Random House in any of their answers to 60 questions about the market. The company's overall score is 26 out of 100, ranking 1,754th of 2,047 companies studied. Its website passes 3 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the media market: none named Penguin Random House. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical media company is named in 15.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Penguin Random House ranks 80 of 99 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
87 of 99
by overall score, where the typical media company scores 36
How Penguin Random House compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with media

99 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score26
Ranks 87 of 99. Typical company: 36
Named in answers0%
Ranks 80 of 99. Typical company: 15%
AI readiness21
Ranks 53 of 99. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“Which graphic novels are suitable for middle schoolers?”

Middle schoolers have a wide variety of graphic novels to choose from, encompassing various genres and themes. Many popular and award-winning titles are suitable for this age group, often dealing with themes of friendship, self-discovery, and navigating adolescence.

Here are some highly recommended graphic novels for middle schoolers:

Realistic Fiction & Coming-of-Age:

"Roller Girl" by Victoria Jamieson is a Newbery Honor Award winner and a New York Times bestseller. It's a heartwarming story about friendship and surviving junior high through roller derby.

"Smile," "Siste …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
Scholastic3Hachette Book Group1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Scholastic
75.0%
Hachette Book Group
25.0%
Penguin Random House
0.0%
HarperCollins
0.0%
Simon & Schuster
0.0%
Macmillan Publishers US
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
72 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPartly met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthCould not check

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogCould not check

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryCould not check

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceCould not check

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardCould not check

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsCould not check

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestCould not check

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 35 of 100 · 65% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.penguinrandomhouse.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

reddit.com
30
ala.org
17
justdial.com
12
goodreads.com
11
barnesandnoble.com
8
quora.com
8
goodnovel.com
8
bookriot.com
8
penguinrandomhouse.com (its own website)
7
reedsy.com
6

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Which graphic novels are suitable for middle schoolers?
  • Are there good online platforms for buying discounted children’s books?
  • Where can I discover new authors outside mainstream publishing channels?
  • What are the best books to read for Hispanic Heritage Month?
  • Are special edition book box sets worth the higher price?
  • Which new releases are generating the most buzz this year?
  • Why do some books go out of print so quickly?
  • How can I find books that have been banned or challenged in the US?
  • What are the differences between hardcover, paperback, and digital books?
  • Is it better to buy new releases or wait for them to go on sale?
  • How does self-publishing compare to traditional publishing for debut authors?
  • What is the average price range for bestselling novels in the US?
  • What are good books for starting a book club?
  • What are alternatives to traditional bookstores for finding the latest fiction releases?
  • How do prices compare for audiobooks versus physical books?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo