- Visibility0
- Citations1
- Sentiment50
- Site quality80
- AI readiness36
AI assistants do not name Parker Hannifin in any of their 60 answers, while the typical company in its sector is named in 5% of answers. Its overall score is 27 out of 100, ranking 1,606th of 2,047 companies. The website passes 5 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Parker Hannifin. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Parker Hannifin ranks 191 of 246 in its sector.
Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
The company is not named in this answer
“Average cost differences between basic and advanced fluid power control solutions in the US?”
Let me search for more specific pricing information on fluid power controls.Based on my search results, I can provide you with specific cost information for fluid power control solutions in the US:
Cost Differences Between Basic and Advanced Control Solutions
High-performance servo valves cost $3,200 or more, compared to $428-$1,205 for proportional valves. This represents a significant price differential between basic and advanced control solutions.
What These Options Offer
Proportional Valves (Basic/Mid-Range): Proportional valves are simpler in structure with less stringent m …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.
- Content Signals
The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
- study: 86.8%SitemapPassed
An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPartly met
Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · www.parker.com · 2,047 companies scanned
5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
This website sets rules for 12 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.
- GPTBot*allowed
- ClaudeBot*allowed
- Anthropic-AI*allowed
- Google-Extended*blocked
- Applebot-Extended*blocked
- Meta-ExternalAgent*blocked
- FacebookBot*allowed
- Bytespiderpartly
- CCBot*blocked
- Diffbotpartly
- Omgilibot*blocked
- OAI-SearchBotpartly
- Claude-SearchBotpartly
- PerplexityBot*allowed
- Applebotpartly
- Amazonbotpartly
- YouBotpartly
- ChatGPT-User*allowed
- Claude-Userpartly
- Perplexity-Userpartly
- DuckAssistBot*allowed
- MistralAI-Userpartly
Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as S&P 500.
- Differences between hydraulic and electromechanical actuators in motion control setups?
- Best motion control technologies for improving efficiency in manufacturing plants?
- What are the main options for eco-friendly motion control technology in manufacturing?
- How do electrohydraulic systems compare with purely pneumatic systems for industrial automation?
- What are the most reliable motion and control solutions for aerospace applications?
- How can motion and control components enhance system reliability in aerospace equipment?
- Average cost differences between basic and advanced fluid power control solutions in the US?
- Is premium filtration essential for optimal hydraulic system performance in industrial settings?
- Are advanced motion and control technologies worth the investment for small manufacturers?
- Common reasons for reduced efficiency in motion control systems and how to fix them?
- What causes pneumatic actuators to lose precision in automated lines?
- What factors affect the price of custom motion control assemblies for OEMs?
- Best practices for integrating sensors into industrial motion control systems?
- Substitutes for standard motion control valves in high-speed production environments?
- Alternatives to traditional hydraulic systems for heavy-duty industrial applications?
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.