Back to the study

Palo Alto Networks

paloaltonetworks.com · Technology · PANW

Ranked 559 of 2,047 companies in the study

38Overall score
  • Visibility17
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment83
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness43
What this means for Palo Alto Networks

AI assistants name Palo Alto Networks in 13.3% of answers, which is somewhat more often than the typical company in the technology sector. Its overall score is 38 out of 100, ranking 559th of 2,047 companies. The company's website passes 5 out of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the technology market: none named Palo Alto Networks. AI assistants named it in 8 of 60 answers (13.3%). The typical technology company is named in 10.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Palo Alto Networks ranks 111 of 273 in its sector.

Named by AI in
13.3%
8 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
22.2%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
5/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
89 of 273
by overall score, where the typical technology company scores 36
How Palo Alto Networks compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
17

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
83

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
43

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with technology

273 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score38
Ranks 89 of 273. Typical company: 36
Named in answers13%
Ranks 111 of 273. Typical company: 10%
AI readiness43
Ranks 14 of 273. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“How do AI-driven security platforms compare to traditional security information and event management solutions?”

AI-driven security platforms offer significant advancements over traditional Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions by leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning to enhance threat detection, analysis, and response. While traditional SIEMs are still valuable, AI-driven platforms are better equipped to handle the complexities of modern cyber threats and the vast amounts of data generated by today's IT environments.

Here's a comparison of how they stack up:

Traditional SIEM Solutions

Traditional SIEM platforms primarily focus on aggregating and analyzing lo …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
CrowdStrike8Fortinet2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

CrowdStrike
38.7%
Palo Alto Networks
25.8%
Fortinet
12.9%
Check Point Software Technologies
12.9%
Cisco Secure (Cisco Systems)
9.7%
Sophos
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
4/15
Claude
2/15
OpenAI
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 43 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.paloaltonetworks.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 5 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBot*partly
  • Claude-SearchBot*partly
  • PerplexityBot*partly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-User*partly
  • Claude-User*partly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

sentinelone.com
21
fortinet.com
12
microsoft.com
11
zscaler.com
10
wiz.io
9
paloaltonetworks.com (its own website)
9
checkpoint.com
9
helpnetsecurity.com
9
learn.microsoft.com
8
crowdstrike.com
8

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (5 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Is investing in managed SOC services worth it for midsize enterprises?
  • How do AI-driven security platforms compare to traditional security information and event management solutions?
  • What are the best enterprise cybersecurity platforms for protecting hybrid cloud environments?
  • Why might a next-generation firewall fail to block a targeted ransomware attack?
  • How can cybersecurity software support regulatory compliance for healthcare organizations?
  • Are advanced threat prevention tools cost-effective for US-based financial institutions?
  • Which threat intelligence services are essential for large organizations in the US?
  • How are enterprise cybersecurity subscriptions typically priced in the United States?
  • What security measures help protect remote employees in a hybrid workforce setup?
  • Which open-source cybersecurity tools can be used instead of proprietary enterprise solutions?
  • Network security firewalls vs zero trust architecture—what are the key differences for enterprises?
  • What are some alternatives to signature-based malware detection for cloud security?
  • What are alternatives to purchasing bundled cybersecurity platforms for large-scale enterprises?
  • What factors influence the total cost of ownership for advanced network security solutions?
  • How do you resolve issues with cloud workload protection not syncing configurations across data centers?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 38 of 100 badge for Palo Alto Networks

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/paloaltonetworks.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/paloaltonetworks.com.svg" alt="Overall score 38 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo