Back to the study

Occidental Petroleum

oxy.com · Energy · OXY

Ranked 760 of 2,047 companies in the study

36Overall score
  • Visibility15
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment83
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Occidental Petroleum

AI assistants name Occidental Petroleum in 10% of answers, which is more often than the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 36 points out of 100, ranking 760th of 2,047 companies. The website passes 1 out of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the energy market: none named Occidental Petroleum. AI assistants named it in 6 of 60 answers (10.0%). The typical energy company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Occidental Petroleum ranks 20 of 109 in its sector.

Named by AI in
10.0%
6 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
22.2%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
20 of 109
by overall score, where the typical energy company scores 29
How Occidental Petroleum compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
15

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
83

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with energy

109 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score36
Ranks 20 of 109. Typical company: 29
Named in answers10%
Ranks 20 of 109. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness21
Ranks 52 of 109. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“Typical costs for industrial-scale carbon management solutions in the oil and gas sector”

The costs for industrial-scale carbon management solutions in the oil and gas sector vary significantly depending on the technology, project scale, and specific site characteristics. These solutions primarily include Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS), Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), and Direct Air Capture (DAC).

Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS)

CCUS involves capturing CO2 emissions from industrial processes, transporting it, and then either reusing it or storing it permanently underground in geological formations like saline aquifers or dep …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Chevron4ExxonMobil4ConocoPhillips2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

ExxonMobil
36.4%
Occidental Petroleum
27.3%
Chevron
27.3%
ConocoPhillips
9.1%
bp
0.0%
Shell USA
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
3/15
Claude
1/15
OpenAI
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.oxy.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

iea.org
18
energy.gov
12
epa.gov
11
mckinsey.com
11
mdpi.com
10
chevron.com
10
corporate.exxonmobil.com
10
oxy.com (its own website)
9
rff.org
9
catf.us
8

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (3 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Emerging trends in US oil and gas production aimed at supporting global sustainability targets
  • Carbon capture vs direct air capture for industrial emissions—what's the difference?
  • Typical costs for industrial-scale carbon management solutions in the oil and gas sector
  • Ways energy buyers can lower their carbon footprint through sourcing strategies in the US
  • Is investing in oil and gas companies with advanced carbon management worth it for long-term sustainability?
  • Alternatives to oil and gas for large-scale industrial energy needs with low emissions
  • What are the top oil and gas producers in the US offering carbon management solutions?
  • Why might industrial carbon management solutions not deliver expected reductions?
  • How does incorporating carbon management impact the price of energy for US buyers?
  • How do governments utilize oil and gas producers with carbon management for sustainability goals?
  • What other technologies can replace traditional oil and gas production while reducing carbon output?
  • What should energy buyers look for when selecting a supplier with low-carbon initiatives?
  • How do traditional oil and gas producers compare to those focused on carbon management?
  • Common challenges when integrating carbon capture technology in oil and gas operations
  • Best ways industrial clients can source reliable energy with low-carbon impact
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 36 of 100 badge for Occidental Petroleum

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/oxy.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/oxy.com.svg" alt="Overall score 36 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo