Back to the study

Oneok

oneok.com · Energy · OKE

Ranked 1,207 of 2,047 companies in the study

30Overall score
  • Visibility15
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness14
What this means for Oneok

AI assistants name Oneok in 11.7% of answers, more often than the typical company in the Energy sector at 3.3%. Its overall score is 30 out of 100, ranking 1,207th of 2,047 companies. The company's website passes 2 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the energy market: none named Oneok. AI assistants named it in 7 of 60 answers (11.7%). The typical energy company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Oneok ranks 19 of 109 in its sector.

Named by AI in
11.7%
7 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
19.4%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
49 of 109
by overall score, where the typical energy company scores 29
How Oneok compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
15

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with energy

109 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score30
Ranks 49 of 109. Typical company: 29
Named in answers12%
Ranks 19 of 109. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness14
Ranks 85 of 109. Typical company: 21
What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are the top midstream energy infrastructure providers in the US for natural gas liquids transportation?”

Based on current market data, here are the top midstream energy infrastructure providers in the US for natural gas liquids transportation:

Enterprise Products Partners L.P. - Enterprise Products Partners is the largest US midstream company by total asset scale, operating approximately 50,000 miles of pipeline and the world's largest NGL fractionation and transportation network centred on Mont Belvieu, Texas.

ONEOK, Inc. - ONEOK is a diversified midstream service provider specializing in natural gas gathering, processing, storage, and transportation, as well as natural gas liquids tra …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Energy Transfer4Kinder Morgan3Enterprise Products Partners3ONEOK, Inc.1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Oneok
22.6%
Energy Transfer
22.6%
Kinder Morgan
19.4%
Enterprise Products Partners
19.4%
Williams Companies
12.9%
MPLX LP
3.2%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
OpenAI
2/15
Perplexity
2/15
Claude
1/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
31 of 100
  • robots.txtNot met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPartly met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
0 of 100
  • AI bot rulesNot met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 7 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.oneok.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

eia.gov
14
umbrex.com
12
rrc.texas.gov
10
sec.gov
10
kindermorgan.com
8
energy.gov
8
mordorintelligence.com
7
ferc.gov
6
ibinterviewquestions.com
6
ir.oneok.com
6

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (3 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • In what scenarios would a large-scale energy buyer need both natural gas liquids and refined products transportation services?
  • What are the top midstream energy infrastructure providers in the US for natural gas liquids transportation?
  • What are some effective substitutes for traditional natural gas liquids fractionation services?
  • Best options for natural gas gathering and processing to connect supply basins with large markets?
  • Options besides large midstream service providers for gathering and processing natural gas?
  • How can energy producers resolve imbalances or bottlenecks in natural gas liquefaction and storage?
  • What should I do if there are consistent delays in petroleum product deliveries via midstream pipelines?
  • Is investing in integrated midstream pipeline operators worthwhile for energy producers?
  • How do midstream infrastructure companies help refiners access multiple energy supply basins?
  • Alternatives to long-haul pipelines for transporting crude oil to market centers?
  • How are storage and distribution costs structured for petroleum products in integrated pipeline networks?
  • What are typical transportation fees for natural gas pipelines in the US midstream sector?
  • Natural gas gathering and processing versus refined products pipelines—what are the key differences for energy producers?
  • How does natural gas liquids transportation compare to crude oil pipelines in terms of cost and efficiency?
  • Are diversified midstream service providers more reliable for large-scale energy buyers?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 30 of 100 badge for Oneok

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/oneok.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/oneok.com.svg" alt="Overall score 30 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo