Back to the study

Omnicom Group

omnicomgroup.com · Media · OMC

Ranked 1,124 of 2,047 companies in the study

31Overall score
  • Visibility14
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness29
What this means for Omnicom Group

AI assistants name Omnicom Group in 8.3% of answers. This is less often than the typical company in the sector, named in 15% of answers. Omnicom Group’s overall score is 31 out of 100, ranking 1,124th of 2,047. Its website passes 4 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the media market: none named Omnicom Group. AI assistants named it in 5 of 60 answers (8.3%). The typical media company is named in 15.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Omnicom Group ranks 60 of 99 in its sector.

Named by AI in
8.3%
5 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
21.7%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
59 of 99
by overall score, where the typical media company scores 36
How Omnicom Group compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
14

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with media

99 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score31
Ranks 59 of 99. Typical company: 36
Named in answers8%
Ranks 60 of 99. Typical company: 15%
AI readiness29
Ranks 26 of 99. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“Which types of agencies can replace unified intelligence backbones for enterprise marketing?”

While traditional digital marketing agencies may have limited insights, several types of agencies and solutions are emerging to provide unified intelligence for enterprise marketing:

1. Agencies with Proprietary AI and Unified Platforms:

Holding company solutions: Some large advertising holding companies, like Omnicom with their Omni platform, offer comprehensive marketing intelligence platforms. These platforms aim to connect strategy, creativity, media, CRM, commerce, data, and AI to provide a single source of truth and optimize performance across all marketing efforts. …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Dentsu5WPP3Publicis Groupe3
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Omnicom Group
27.8%
Dentsu
22.2%
WPP
16.7%
Interpublic Group (IPG)
11.1%
Publicis Groupe
11.1%
Accenture Song
11.1%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
Perplexity
1/15
Claude
1/15
OpenAI
1/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

Not by itself. Omnicom Group publishes none of the purchase protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the checkout like a person.

  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present

The shop runs on WooCommerce.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.omc.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

marketing-interactive.com
13
improvado.io
12
insiderone.com
11
pipeline.zoominfo.com
11
blog.hubspot.com
10
oracle.com
10
braze.com
8
monday.com
7
cometly.com
7
supermetrics.com
6

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (2 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What are successful examples of outcome-driven activation in enterprise marketing strategies?
  • What are alternatives to integrated marketing and sales firms for brands needing connected capabilities?
  • Which types of agencies can replace unified intelligence backbones for enterprise marketing?
  • How do data-driven marketing platforms compare to traditional agency models for large-scale campaigns?
  • How can large businesses resolve issues with their marketing automation not aligning with sales outcomes?
  • Which companies offer comprehensive marketing, sales, and communications services for major brands?
  • Are outcome-based pricing models common for integrated marketing services in the United States?
  • What are the best integrated marketing and sales solutions for large enterprises?
  • What is the typical pricing structure for comprehensive marketing and sales solutions targeting enterprises in the US?
  • Best AI-driven marketing technology platforms for nationwide brands looking to scale personalization.
  • Why might an integrated marketing campaign underperform even with advanced analytics?
  • Integrated marketing solutions vs specialized service providers for enterprise needs — what's the difference?
  • How do predictive intelligence tools enhance campaign performance for national brands?
  • Do AI-powered marketing intelligence tools deliver measurable results for big brands?
  • Is investing in unified marketing and sales orchestration platforms worth it for enterprise growth?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 31 of 100 badge for Omnicom Group

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/omnicomgroup.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/omnicomgroup.com.svg" alt="Overall score 31 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo