Back to the study

The New York Times

nytimes.com · Media

Ranked 167 of 2,047 companies in the study

43Overall score
  • Visibility36
  • Citations3
  • Sentiment73
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness29
What this means for The New York Times

AI assistants name The New York Times in 40% of answers, much more often than the typical company in the Media sector, which is named in 15%. Its overall score is 43 out of 100, ranking 167th of 2,047 companies studied. Its website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the media market: none named The New York Times. AI assistants named it in 24 of 60 answers (40.0%). The typical media company is named in 15.0% of answers. By how often it is named, The New York Times ranks 25 of 99 in its sector.

Named by AI in
40.0%
24 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
30.8%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
17 of 99
by overall score, where the typical media company scores 36
How The New York Times compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
36

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
3

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
73

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with media

99 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score43
Ranks 17 of 99. Typical company: 36
Named in answers40%
Ranks 25 of 99. Typical company: 15%
AI readiness29
Ranks 26 of 99. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“Are there student or educator discounts for online news subscriptions?”

Yes, many online news publications offer discounted subscriptions for students and educators. These discounts can provide significant savings on digital access.

Some popular news sources with student and educator discounts include:

The Washington Post offers an "Academic Rate" that provides educators, staff, and college students with a 90% discount on All-Access Digital subscriptions, costing $1 every four weeks for the first year, then renewing at $7 every four weeks. K-12 teachers are also eligible for this rate.

The Economist provides a 75% discount on digital-only subscri …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
The Washington Post15USA Today3
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

The New York Times
32.9%
Reuters U.S.
23.3%
The Washington Post
20.5%
The Wall Street Journal
16.4%
USA Today
4.1%
Los Angeles Times
2.7%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
9/15
Gemini
6/15
OpenAI
5/15
Perplexity
4/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
100 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersCould not check

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationCould not check

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 30 of 100 · 81% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.nytimes.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 20 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBot*blocked
  • ClaudeBot*blocked
  • Anthropic-AI*blocked
  • Google-Extended*blocked
  • Applebot-Extended*blocked
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*blocked
  • FacebookBot*blocked
  • Bytespider*blocked
  • CCBot*blocked
  • Diffbot*blocked
  • Omgilibot*blocked
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBot*blocked
  • Claude-SearchBot*blocked
  • PerplexityBot*blocked
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbot*partly
  • YouBot*blocked
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-User*blocked
  • Claude-User*blocked
  • Perplexity-User*blocked
  • DuckAssistBot*blocked
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
20
nytimes.com (its own website)
19
reddit.com
18
ground.news
15
pewresearch.org
13
pressgazette.co.uk
11
propublica.org
10
reuters.com
10
studentbeans.com
9
justdial.com
8

In the study as Consumer brands. One of the most visited websites in the United States (Similarweb, August 2026).

Every question, and where the company came up (11 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Are there student or educator discounts for online news subscriptions?
  • What are some alternatives to subscription-based digital news publishers for reliable reporting?
  • How do digital news publishers compare to traditional newspapers in terms of coverage and timeliness?
  • What are the differences between news aggregator apps and dedicated digital news publishers?
  • Do online news paywalls actually provide access to more investigative journalism?
  • Are there nonprofit online news sources that offer comprehensive national and international coverage?
  • What are the best digital news publishers for both U.S. and international news coverage?
  • How can I access multimedia news content, like opinion videos and photo essays, from a single source?
  • How can I manage privacy preferences while browsing news publishers online?
  • What is the average monthly price for unlimited access to digital news in the U.S.?
  • Why am I hitting an article limit on digital news websites and how can I read more for free?
  • What's the most convenient way to follow breaking news on U.S. politics digitally?
  • Is a digital news subscription worth the monthly cost for comprehensive reporting?
  • Where can I find free live news updates and analysis online?
  • Where can I find in-depth reporting and analysis on current events online?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 43 of 100 badge for The New York Times

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/nytimes.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/nytimes.com.svg" alt="Overall score 43 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo