Back to the study

Nkarta Therapeutics

nkartatx.com · Technology · NKTX

Ranked 1,123 of 2,047 companies in the study

31Overall score
  • Visibility19
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness7
What this means for Nkarta Therapeutics

AI assistants name Nkarta Therapeutics in 8.3% of answers, which is slightly less often than the typical company in the technology sector at 10%. Its overall score is 31 out of 100, placing it 1,123rd of 2,047 companies. The company's website passes 1 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the technology market: none named Nkarta Therapeutics. AI assistants named it in 5 of 60 answers (8.3%). The typical technology company is named in 10.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Nkarta Therapeutics ranks 151 of 273 in its sector.

Named by AI in
8.3%
5 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
35.7%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
188 of 273
by overall score, where the typical technology company scores 36
How Nkarta Therapeutics compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
19

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
7

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with technology

273 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score31
Ranks 188 of 273. Typical company: 36
Named in answers8%
Ranks 151 of 273. Typical company: 10%
AI readiness7
Ranks 255 of 273. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“Should patients with refractory autoimmune disease consider experimental natural killer cell therapies?”

Patients with refractory autoimmune diseases may consider experimental natural killer (NK) cell therapies, as research and clinical trials are exploring their potential. NK cells are a vital part of the innate immune system, capable of identifying and destroying abnormal cells. In autoimmune diseases, the immune system mistakenly attacks the body's own healthy cells.

Here's a breakdown of why patients might consider these therapies and what the current landscape looks like:

How NK Cell Therapies Work for Autoimmune Diseases:

Many autoimmune diseases are driven by autoreactive B-cells …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Artiva Biotherapeutics5
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Nkarta Therapeutics
55.6%
Artiva Biotherapeutics
44.4%
Kyverna Therapeutics
0.0%
Caballeta Bio
0.0%
Cartesian Therapeutics
0.0%
Be Biopharma
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
3/15
Perplexity
1/15
Claude
1/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
0 of 100
  • robots.txtNot met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
0 of 100
  • AI bot rulesNot met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 0 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.nkartatx.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
150
frontiersin.org
65
nature.com
25
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
24
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
22
link.springer.com
15
nkartatx.com (its own website)
14
artivabio.com
14
globenewswire.com
11
tandfonline.com
10

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (3 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Should patients with refractory autoimmune disease consider experimental natural killer cell therapies?
  • Are there insurance coverage options or financial assistance programs for natural killer cell therapy in autoimmune care?
  • What is the current clinical trial landscape for natural killer cell therapy targeting autoimmune conditions?
  • Which autoimmune diseases are showing the most promise with natural killer cell therapies?
  • Is participating in clinical trials for natural killer cell therapy for autoimmune diseases safe and effective?
  • What alternative immunotherapies exist for patients not eligible for natural killer cell therapy in autoimmune treatment?
  • How is natural killer cell therapy applied in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune diseases?
  • Who might benefit most from natural killer cell therapy in the context of autoimmune disorders?
  • Natural killer cell therapies vs CAR-T cell therapies for managing autoimmune conditions—how do they differ?
  • What factors influence the cost of natural killer cell therapy for autoimmune diseases in the US?
  • What challenges might patients experience during natural killer cell therapy for autoimmune disease?
  • What are the leading approaches in natural killer cell therapy for autoimmune diseases?
  • Which cellular therapies are being explored as alternatives to natural killer cell-based approaches for autoimmune disease?
  • How does natural killer cell therapy compare to traditional biologic treatments for autoimmune disorders?
  • How can immune-related side effects of natural killer cell treatments be managed in autoimmune patients?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 31 of 100 badge for Nkarta Therapeutics

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/nkartatx.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/nkartatx.com.svg" alt="Overall score 31 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo