Back to the study

New York Life Insurance

newyorklife.com · Finance

Ranked 1,751 of 2,047 companies in the study

26Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness21
What this means for New York Life Insurance

AI assistants do not name New York Life Insurance in any of the 60 answers. Its overall score is 26 out of 100, ranking 1,751st of 2,047 companies. The website passes 3 of 14 technical checks measuring how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the finance market: none named New York Life Insurance. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical finance company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, New York Life Insurance ranks 135 of 205 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
156 of 205
by overall score, where the typical finance company scores 29
How New York Life Insurance compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with finance

205 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score26
Ranks 156 of 205. Typical company: 29
Named in answers0%
Ranks 135 of 205. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness21
Ranks 82 of 205. Typical company: 21
What Claude actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“What are the best types of life insurance for families with young children?”

I'll search for current information on the best types of life insurance for families with young children.Based on current 2026 information, here are the best types of life insurance for families with young children:

Primary Type: Term Life Insurance

For 90% of young families, 20- or 30-year level term life insurance is the best solution. Term life insurance offers the most affordable protection for young families with temporary needs. You should choose a term that runs until your youngest child is expected to be financially independent — typically 20 or 25 years for most families with you …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

MassMutual (Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company)
25.0%
Prudential Financial
25.0%
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
25.0%
State Farm Life Insurance
25.0%
New York Life Insurance
0.0%
Northwestern Mutual
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
80 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed

    SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 28 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.newyorklife.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

nerdwallet.com
16
smartasset.com
14
guardianlife.com
14
aflac.com
13
annuity.org
13
newyorklife.com (its own website)
12
investopedia.com
11
westernsouthern.com
10
moneygeek.com
9
northwesternmutual.com
9

In the study as Large private companies.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What are common strategies for integrating life insurance into an estate plan?
  • Which financial products besides annuities can offer guaranteed retirement income?
  • What factors impact the cost of a personalized retirement plan with an advisor?
  • Do I really need professional financial guidance for starting a retirement plan?
  • What should I look for in a comprehensive financial advisory service?
  • How much does term life insurance typically cost for a healthy adult in the US?
  • How can cash value from a life insurance policy be used to pay for college expenses?
  • Term life insurance vs whole life insurance: which is better for long-term security?
  • What are the best types of life insurance for families with young children?
  • What are alternatives to traditional life insurance for providing financial security?
  • Is it worth getting universal life insurance if I'm in my 30s?
  • How do I update beneficiaries on my existing life insurance policy?
  • What can I do if my life insurance claim is delayed?
  • How does investing in annuities compare to other retirement income options?
  • How do I choose a financial advisor for retirement planning in the US?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo