Back to the study

Nerdy

nerdy.com · Technology · NRDY

Ranked 1,748 of 2,047 companies in the study

26Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Nerdy

AI assistants do not name Nerdy in any of their 60 answers, while in this sector the typical company is named in 10% of answers. Nerdy has an overall score of 26 out of 100, ranking 1,748th of 2,047 companies in the study. Its website passes 3 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the technology market: none named Nerdy. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical technology company is named in 10.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Nerdy ranks 236 of 273 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
237 of 273
by overall score, where the typical technology company scores 36
How Nerdy compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with technology

273 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score26
Ranks 237 of 273. Typical company: 36
Named in answers0%
Ranks 236 of 273. Typical company: 10%
AI readiness21
Ranks 161 of 273. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“Why might a student not see progress after several online tutoring sessions?”

There are several reasons why a student might not see progress after multiple online tutoring sessions. These can be categorized into issues with the student, the tutor, the learning environment, or the structure of the tutoring itself.

1. Student-Related Factors:

Lack of Motivation or Engagement: Students may not be actively participating, asking questions, or completing assignments between sessions. They might feel burnt out if they're already spending many hours in school. If a student believes they "can't" succeed, it can hinder progress regardless of the tutoring.

Learn …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
Preply4Tutor.com4Wyzant3Skooli2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Tutor.com
58.3%
Preply
16.7%
Wyzant
12.5%
Skooli
8.3%
Chegg Tutors
4.2%
Nerdy
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · nerdy.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

brighterly.com
16
cuemath.com
10
preply.com
10
thirdspacelearning.com
8
elearningindustry.com
7
wise.live
7
tutor.com
7
growingstars.com
7
justdial.com
7
care.com
6

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Why might a student not see progress after several online tutoring sessions?
  • Which online learning platforms offer expert instruction in over 100 subjects?
  • What are the best live online tutoring platforms for high school math support?
  • What is the typical hourly rate for expert online tutors in the United States?
  • How does live online tutoring compare to in-person tutoring for college test prep?
  • What alternatives exist for students seeking self-paced online courses instead of live tutoring?
  • Which platforms offer hybrid models combining AI-powered resources with instructor-led learning?
  • Where can parents find US-based online learning platforms with real-time video tools for K-12 students?
  • What are the pros and cons of group online learning sessions versus 1-to-1 private tutoring?
  • Does investing in weekly live prep classes improve standardized test scores?
  • How can technical issues in live online learning environments be minimized?
  • Is paying for personalized live online tutoring worth it for AP exam preparation?
  • What are the most effective ways to use AI features in online tutoring sessions?
  • How can live expert instruction support students struggling in STEM subjects?
  • Are there affordable subscription options for unlimited access to live online classes?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo