Back to the study

Moog

moog.com · Industrial

Ranked 906 of 2,047 companies in the study

34Overall score
  • Visibility21
  • Citations3
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Moog

AI assistants name Moog in 10% of answers. This is more often than the typical company in its sector, which is named in 5% of answers. Moog's overall score is 34 out of 100, ranking 906th of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 3 out of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Moog. AI assistants named it in 6 of 60 answers (10.0%). The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Moog ranks 74 of 246 in its sector.

Named by AI in
10.0%
6 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
37.5%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
96 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How Moog compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
21

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
3

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score34
Ranks 96 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers10%
Ranks 74 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness21
Ranks 107 of 246. Typical company: 21
What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

“Best motion control components for high-speed industrial automation?”

“Best” depends on the application, but for high‑speed industrial automation the right components share common characteristics: low inertia, high continuous & peak power, high-resolution feedback, fast/low-latency communications and tight mechanical stiffness/alignment. Below I’ll summarize the component categories to focus on, what to look for in each, well-regarded technologies/brands, and practical selection/installation tips. If you give specifics (speeds, cycle times, axes, loads, environment, budget) I’ll make tailored product suggestions.

1) Motors

Type: direct-drive or high‑response …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Honeywell Aerospace2Curtiss-Wright1Parker Hannifin1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Moog
54.5%
Honeywell Aerospace
18.2%
Parker Hannifin
9.1%
Curtiss-Wright
9.1%
Woodward, Inc.
9.1%
ITT Inc. (Motion Technologies)
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
3/15
Perplexity
1/15
Claude
1/15
OpenAI
1/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.moog.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

moog.com (its own website)
19
ntrs.nasa.gov
17
automate.org
13
apps.dtic.mil
12
pi-usa.us
11
eureka.patsnap.com
9
image-ppubs.uspto.gov
8
powermotiontech.com
7
eetimes.com
6
kollmorgen.com
5

In the study as Large private companies.

Every question, and where the company came up (5 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Servo valves vs proportional valves in industrial machinery—pros and cons
  • How are motion control systems used to improve packaging line efficiency?
  • How do costs compare between different types of propulsion systems for launch vehicles?
  • Best motion control components for high-speed industrial automation?
  • Replacement options for legacy industrial slip rings in automated machinery?
  • Alternatives to traditional servo valves for precise hydraulic control
  • How to diagnose failure in automated turreted weapon systems
  • Differences between hydraulic and electric actuation for aircraft systems
  • Typical price range for advanced actuation systems in the U.S. market
  • What are substitute technologies for weapon stores management in defense platforms?
  • What should I consider before purchasing slip rings for satellite applications?
  • Common causes of drift in precision position control for robotics
  • Are high-performance servo drives worth the investment for medical device manufacturing?
  • What are the most reliable precision motion control systems for aerospace applications?
  • Applications of hexapods in space vehicle testing and simulation
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 34 of 100 badge for Moog

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/moog.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/moog.com.svg" alt="Overall score 34 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo