Back to the study

Melin

melin.com · Retail

Ranked 154 of 2,047 companies in the study

44Overall score
  • Visibility13
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness57
What this means for Melin

AI assistants rarely name Melin, mentioning the company in 2 of 60 answers. Its overall score is 44 out of 100, ranking 154th of 2,047 companies. Melin's website passes 8 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named Melin. AI assistants named it in 2 of 60 answers (3.3%). The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, Melin ranks 392 of 640 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
3.3%
2 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
28.6%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
8/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
38 of 640
by overall score, where the typical retail company scores 34
How Melin compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
13

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
57

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with retail

640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score44
Ranks 38 of 640. Typical company: 34
Named in answers3%
Ranks 392 of 640. Typical company: 7%
AI readiness57
Ranks 79 of 640. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“Recommended headwear for golfing in hot weather”

When golfing in hot weather, selecting the right headwear is crucial for comfort and sun protection. Key features to prioritize include wide brims for shade, breathable and moisture-wicking materials, and good ventilation.

Here are some recommended headwear options:

Wide-brimmed Hats (Bucket Hats/Aussie Hats): These offer excellent 360-degree sun protection for your face, ears, and neck, which helps lower your body temperature. Many are designed with lightweight, breathable fabrics and mesh panels for ventilation. Some even allow you to wet the crown for evaporative cooling. …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Melin
100.0%
Lids
0.0%
New Era Cap
0.0%
Richardson Sports
0.0%
Vuori (Headwear Collection)
0.0%
Branded Bills
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

Yes. Melin publishes a UCP profile, a file that tells an AI agent how to buy, and it includes checkout.

  • UCPPublished
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present

The page also offers an agent tools inside the browser: add to cart, proceed to checkout, update cart lines.

The shop runs on Shopify.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
27 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPassed

    OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourcePassed

    Metadata telling agents which authorization server to use.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPPassed

    Tools registered in the browser through navigator.modelContext.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 45 of 100 · 100% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · melin.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

8 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • PassedMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

irunfar.com
17
treelinereview.com
16
reddit.com
15
rushordertees.com
14
runnersworld.com
14
rei.com
13
dickssportinggoods.com
11
huegahouse.com
10
adidas.com
9
thegirlthatruns.com
7

In the study as US retailers: listed as a retailer in Wikidata, a public database, and among the websites Cloudflare Radar ranks as visited.

Every question, and where the company came up (2 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Recommended headwear for golfing in hot weather
  • Are high-end moisture-wicking hats worth the extra cost?
  • Is there a noticeable quality difference between $30 and $100 athletic hats?
  • Alternatives to high-end performance headwear for budget-conscious shoppers
  • Top-rated moisture-wicking headwear for summer activities
  • Best hats for runners who sweat a lot
  • Tips for keeping performance hats odor-free after workouts
  • How to clean sweat stains off athletic hats?
  • Typical price range for premium performance headwear in the US
  • What are the best performance hats for outdoor workouts?
  • What makes premium athletic hats stand out from regular hats?
  • Snapback vs fitted performance hats—what's better for an active lifestyle?
  • Performance headwear vs traditional caps for durability
  • What are some eco-friendly options for moisture-wicking headwear?
  • Best hat features for style-conscious athletes
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo