Back to the study

Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia

marthastewart.com · Media · MSO

Ranked 1,176 of 2,047 companies in the study

31Overall score
  • Visibility3
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality100
  • AI readiness29
What this means for Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia

AI assistants rarely name Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, mentioning the company in 1 of 60 answers. Its overall score is 31 out of 100, which ranks 1,176th of 2,047. The website passes 4 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the media market: none named Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. AI assistants named it in 1 of 60 answers (1.7%). The typical media company is named in 15.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia ranks 75 of 99 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
5.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
59 of 99
by overall score, where the typical media company scores 36
How Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
3

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
100

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with media

99 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score31
Ranks 59 of 99. Typical company: 36
Named in answers2%
Ranks 75 of 99. Typical company: 15%
AI readiness29
Ranks 26 of 99. Typical company: 29
What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are some alternatives to traditional magazines for finding craft and recipe ideas?”

Yes—there are several alternatives to traditional magazines for finding craft and recipe ideas. Good options include craft blogs and maker websites, video/tutorial platforms, and digital magazine subscriptions that focus on specific hobbies or techniques.

Craft blogs and handmade sites: These offer lots of free project ideas, patterns, and tutorials, and there are thousands of craft-related blogs and websites online.

Video platforms and tutorial libraries: Sites and publishers increasingly share step-by-step how-tos, demos, and behind-the-scenes …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Better Homes & Gardens6HGTV3Good Housekeeping2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Better Homes & Gardens
40.0%
HGTV
26.7%
Good Housekeeping
13.3%
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia
6.7%
Real Simple
6.7%
Country Living
6.7%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
1/15
Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
80 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed

    SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPNot met

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 27 of 100 · 100% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · www.marthastewart.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 20 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBot*partly
  • ClaudeBot*blocked
  • Anthropic-AI*partly
  • Google-Extended*partly
  • Applebot-Extended*blocked
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*partly
  • FacebookBot*blocked
  • Bytespider*blocked
  • CCBot*partly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibot*blocked
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBot*partly
  • Claude-SearchBot*partly
  • PerplexityBot*partly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbot*blocked
  • YouBot*blocked
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-User*partly
  • Claude-User*blocked
  • Perplexity-User*blocked
  • DuckAssistBot*blocked
  • MistralAI-User*blocked

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

justdial.com
25
apartmenttherapy.com
19
pressreader.com
12
youtube.com
12
reddit.com
11
homesandgardens.com
9
goodhousekeeping.com
9
magazines.com
9
pocketmags.com
8
hgtv.com
6

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Easy fall centerpiece ideas you can make with items from your local craft store
  • What are the differences between digital lifestyle magazines and print versions for home inspiration?
  • Is it worth subscribing to a lifestyle and home inspiration magazine for daily tips and guidance?
  • What are some alternatives to traditional magazines for finding craft and recipe ideas?
  • Are there affordable options for accessing lifestyle and decor advice online?
  • Why do some homemade candles crack or sink, and how can you prevent it?
  • Best blogs for creative DIY projects and home decorating inspiration
  • What are some top DIY craft project ideas for adults to try at home?
  • How do DIY home decor tutorials compare with buying pre-made decor in terms of creativity and cost?
  • Do premium home and lifestyle platforms offer better value than free online resources for homeowners?
  • What is the typical cost of subscribing to a high-quality home inspiration magazine in the US?
  • Best sources for seasonal decorating inspiration for the living room
  • Where can I find modern kitchen organization tips and visuals for homeowners?
  • How can beginner cooks find reliable recipes for quick weeknight dinners?
  • What should you do if your DIY wall art doesn’t turn out as planned?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo