Back to the study

Mars

mars.com · Consumer goods

Ranked 1,840 of 2,047 companies in the study

25Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness29
What this means for Mars

AI assistants do not name Mars in any of their 60 answers about the consumer goods market. Mars has an overall score of 25 out of 100, ranking 1,840th of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks, showing some readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the consumer goods market: none named Mars. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical consumer goods company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Mars ranks 77 of 118 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
102 of 118
by overall score, where the typical consumer goods company scores 30
How Mars compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with consumer goods

118 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score25
Ranks 102 of 118. Typical company: 30
Named in answers0%
Ranks 77 of 118. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness29
Ranks 24 of 118. Typical company: 21
What Claude actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“Typical price range for family-sized snack packs in U.S. grocery stores”

I'll search for current pricing information on family-sized snack packs in U.S. grocery stores.Based on current U.S. grocery store pricing, here's what you can typically expect for family-sized snack packs:

General Price Range: $3.00 - $12.00+ per pack

Here are some specific examples:

Pudding & Snack Cups:

Family packs of pudding cups (12-count) range around $3.97

Multi-Packs & Variety Boxes:

Frito-Lay variety packs (18-count) are typically $9.97

Cheez-It variety packs (10-count) around $5.97

OREO mini cookies (10-pack) approximately $5.97

Larger Family-Size Bags: …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

The Hershey Company
100.0%
Mars
0.0%
Nestlé USA
0.0%
The J.M. Smucker Co.
0.0%
Mondelez International (U.S.)
0.0%
General Mills
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
80 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed

    SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
25 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPartly met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPNot met

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 32 of 100 · 100% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · www.mars.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

target.com
15
chewy.com
12
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
11
walmart.com
11
justdial.com
10
petmd.com
9
bbc.co.uk
8
businessinsider.com
8
reddit.com
8
fda.gov
5

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Quick and easy meal solutions for busy families
  • Substitutes for sweet snacks for kids with food allergies
  • Why is my dog refusing to eat their regular kibble?
  • What are some alternatives to animal-based pet food?
  • Popular nutrition-focused meal ideas for weeknight dinners
  • Difference between dry pet food and wet pet food for cats
  • Best types of affordable snacks for school lunches
  • Typical price range for family-sized snack packs in U.S. grocery stores
  • Healthy treats options for rewarding pets during training
  • How much should I expect to spend on pet care essentials every month?
  • What are the healthiest pet food options for dogs available in the U.S.?
  • What to do if snack packaging is damaged before opening?
  • How do plant-based snacks compare to traditional snacks in terms of nutrition?
  • Are organic snack foods better for kids?
  • Is premium dog food really worth the higher price?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo