Back to the study

Market of Choice

marketofchoice.com · Retail

Ranked 328 of 2,047 companies in the study

41Overall score
  • Visibility24
  • Citations3
  • Sentiment85
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness29
What this means for Market of Choice

AI assistants name Market of Choice in 16.7% of answers, which is more than the typical company in the retail sector at 6.7%. Its overall score is 41 out of 100, placing it 328th of 2,047 companies. The website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks showing some readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named Market of Choice. AI assistants named it in 10 of 60 answers (16.7%). The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, Market of Choice ranks 173 of 640 in its sector.

Named by AI in
16.7%
10 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
34.5%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
96 of 640
by overall score, where the typical retail company scores 34
How Market of Choice compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
24

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
3

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
85

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with retail

640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score41
Ranks 96 of 640. Typical company: 34
Named in answers17%
Ranks 173 of 640. Typical company: 7%
AI readiness29
Ranks 222 of 640. Typical company: 29
What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

“Are prices at independent grocery stores in Oregon higher than at larger supermarkets?”

Short answer: Generally yes — many small, independent grocery and convenience stores in Oregon charge higher prices than larger supermarkets — but it depends on the type of independent store and the items you’re buying.

What the evidence shows

Academic and public‑health research comparing “smaller food stores” (corner stores, small groceries) to supermarkets finds smaller stores typically have higher prices for many staple items, in part because of smaller purchase volumes, higher per‑unit procurement costs, and limited distribution options. (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
New Seasons Market6Zupan's Markets2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Market of Choice
41.7%
New Seasons Market
33.3%
Zupan's Markets
16.7%
Food Front Cooperative Grocery
4.2%
Green Zebra Grocery (archive/paused but relevant historical competitor)
4.2%
Co-op Food Stores (Eugene location: Friendly Street Market)
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
4/15
Gemini
3/15
OpenAI
2/15
Claude
1/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

Not by itself. Market of Choice publishes none of the purchase protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the checkout like a person.

  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present

The shop runs on WooCommerce.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · marketofchoice.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

localharvest.org
20
naturalgrocers.com
15
marketofchoice.com (its own website)
14
tastingtable.com
9
supermarketnews.com
8
justdial.com
7
yelp.com
7
bridgetownbites.com
7
oregonlive.com
7
pdxmonthly.com
7

In the study as US retailers: listed as a retailer in Wikidata, a public database, and among the websites Cloudflare Radar ranks as visited.

Every question, and where the company came up (5 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Where can I buy directly from local makers and small farms in my area?
  • Are prices at independent grocery stores in Oregon higher than at larger supermarkets?
  • Best grocery stores for finding chef-prepared meals ready to take home in Oregon
  • Options for buying seasonal Oregon foods if I don’t live near an independent grocery store
  • Is it worth shopping at a family-owned grocery store for everyday essentials?
  • What should I do if my independent grocery store is out of a unique local item I need?
  • Local grocery store vs national supermarket — which is better for organic options?
  • Does buying from a regional grocery store improve food freshness?
  • Best independent grocery stores in Oregon for locally sourced produce
  • Where else can I find community-supported agriculture programs besides my neighborhood grocer?
  • How do independent grocers compare to big chains on supporting local farmers?
  • Where can I find quality regional foods in the Pacific Northwest?
  • How do weekly deals or loyalty programs at regional grocers affect overall grocery spending?
  • How can I find out if my local grocer stocks specific Oregon-made products?
  • Alternatives to regional grocery stores for accessing local produce in Oregon
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 41 of 100 badge for Market of Choice

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/marketofchoice.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/marketofchoice.com.svg" alt="Overall score 41 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo