Back to the study

ManpowerGroup

manpowergroup.com · Industrial · MAN

Ranked 1,839 of 2,047 companies in the study

25Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness14
What this means for ManpowerGroup

AI assistants do not name ManpowerGroup in any of the 60 answers reviewed. Its overall score is 25 out of 100, ranking 1,839th of 2,047 companies. The website passes 2 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named ManpowerGroup. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, ManpowerGroup ranks 191 of 246 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
217 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How ManpowerGroup compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score25
Ranks 217 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers0%
Ranks 191 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness14
Ranks 207 of 246. Typical company: 21
What OpenAI actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“What are the best workforce solutions for rapidly scaling teams in the United States?”

Short answer

To scale quickly in the U.S., combine these workforce solutions (each solves a different bottleneck): 1) Employer-of-Record (EOR) for fastest compliant hiring, 2) Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO) for high-volume or hard-to-fill roles, 3) Managed Service Provider / Vendor Management System (MSP/VMS) for contingent/labor-on-demand programs, 4) Staffing/temp & contract-to-hire agencies for immediate seats, and 5) Freelance/marketplace platforms + direct sourcing (bootcamps, campus pipelines) for flexible, skill-focused capacity. Use payroll/PEO only if you have or will have a U. …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Robert Half
50.0%
Allegis Group
50.0%
ManpowerGroup
0.0%
Randstad USA
0.0%
Adecco USA
0.0%
Kelly Services
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.manpowergroup.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 1 AI crawler by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotblocked
  • ClaudeBotblocked
  • Anthropic-AIblocked
  • Google-Extendedblocked
  • Applebot-Extendedblocked
  • Meta-ExternalAgentblocked
  • FacebookBotblocked
  • Bytespiderblocked
  • CCBotblocked
  • Diffbotblocked
  • Omgilibotblocked
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotblocked
  • Claude-SearchBotblocked
  • PerplexityBotblocked
  • Applebot*partly
  • Amazonbotblocked
  • YouBotblocked
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userblocked
  • Claude-Userblocked
  • Perplexity-Userblocked
  • DuckAssistBotblocked
  • MistralAI-Userblocked

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

justdial.com
25
linkedin.com
14
peoplemanagingpeople.com
14
upwork.com
13
frontlinesourcegroup.com
9
instawork.com
8
clutch.co
8
peoplescout.com
5
indeed.com
5
adp.com
5

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Is it cost-effective for a small business to use a workforce management service?
  • Temporary staffing vs. direct hire: which is better for startups?
  • What factors influence pricing for temporary staffing solutions?
  • How do workforce consulting services compare to traditional staffing agencies?
  • What other options exist besides workforce solutions providers when expanding teams quickly?
  • Why am I struggling to fill specialized roles even with recruitment agencies?
  • What can organizations do if staffing solutions fail to deliver qualified candidates?
  • Are full-service staffing solutions worth the investment for mid-sized businesses?
  • What are the best workforce solutions for rapidly scaling teams in the United States?
  • Ways workforce assessment services help improve hiring decisions
  • Best strategies for finding top talent for short-term projects
  • How can outplacement services support employees during workforce restructuring?
  • How much do workforce consulting services usually cost in the US?
  • Alternatives to using staffing agencies for talent acquisition
  • Recruitment process outsourcing vs. in-house hiring teams: what are the pros and cons?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo