Back to the study

LeSportsac

lesportsac.com · Retail

Ranked 1,010 of 2,047 companies in the study

33Overall score
  • Visibility4
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness71
What this means for LeSportsac

AI assistants rarely name LeSportsac, mentioning the company in 1 of 60 answers. In the same answer, Travelon and Vera Bradley are also named. Its overall score is 33 out of 100, ranking 1,010th of 2,047 companies. The website passes 10 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named LeSportsac. AI assistants named it in 1 of 60 answers (1.7%). The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, LeSportsac ranks 431 of 640 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
7.7%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
10/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
327 of 640
by overall score, where the typical retail company scores 34
How LeSportsac compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
4

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
71

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with retail

640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score33
Ranks 327 of 640. Typical company: 34
Named in answers2%
Ranks 431 of 640. Typical company: 7%
AI readiness71
Ranks 1 of 640. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are some non-leather weekender bags suitable for travel?”

When choosing a non-leather weekender bag, you have a variety of stylish and durable options made from materials like vegan leather, canvas, nylon, and recycled materials. These bags offer practical features for travel while also being cruelty-free and environmentally conscious.

Here are some popular non-leather weekender bag options:

1. Vegan Leather Weekender Bags

Vegan leather provides a luxurious look and feel without using animal products. Many brands offer vegan leather weekender bags that are both stylish and durable.

Matt & Nat offers a collection of 100% vegan-friendly …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Travelon2Vera Bradley1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Baggu
37.5%
Vera Bradley
25.0%
Travelon
25.0%
LeSportsac
12.5%
Lug
0.0%
Kipling
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
1/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

Yes. LeSportsac publishes a UCP profile, a file that tells an AI agent how to buy, and it includes checkout.

  • UCPPublished
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present

The page also offers an agent tools inside the browser: add to cart, proceed to checkout, update cart lines.

The shop runs on Shopify.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
27 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPassed

    OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourcePassed

    Metadata telling agents which authorization server to use.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPPassed

    Tools registered in the browser through navigator.modelContext.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 51 of 100 · 100% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.lesportsac.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

10 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • PassedMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • PassedWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 3 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBot*allowed
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBot*allowed
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-User*allowed
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

travelandleisure.com
17
cnn.com
16
outdoorgearlab.com
15
packhacker.com
14
forbes.com
12
nytimes.com
11
businessinsider.com
10
reddit.com
9
justdial.com
9
luggageinspector.net
8

In the study as US retailers: listed as a retailer in Wikidata, a public database, and among the websites Cloudflare Radar ranks as visited.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What to do if your lightweight handbag loses its shape after washing?
  • Do lightweight travel accessories usually go on sale during holidays?
  • Are lightweight nylon totes worth it for frequent travelers?
  • Typical price range for durable lightweight travel bags
  • What are the best lightweight crossbody bags for everyday use?
  • Which type of crossbody bag works best for theme park visits?
  • Lightweight handbags vs. backpacks for travel convenience
  • Alternatives to nylon totes for those who want lightweight options
  • Best bags for organizing carry-on essentials on a plane
  • Is it worth upgrading to a water-resistant travel bag?
  • How do you fix a jammed zipper on a nylon travel bag?
  • What's the difference between a tote and a weekender bag?
  • Top travel accessories for women who pack light
  • What are some non-leather weekender bags suitable for travel?
  • Where can you find stylish and functional belt bags for women?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo