Back to the study

Leonardo DRS

leonardodrs.com · Industrial · DRS

Ranked 1,735 of 2,047 companies in the study

26Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness7
What this means for Leonardo DRS

AI assistants do not name Leonardo DRS in any of their 60 answers. Its overall score is 26 out of 100, ranking 1,735th of 2,047 companies and 190th of 246 in its sector. The website passes 1 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Leonardo DRS. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Leonardo DRS ranks 191 of 246 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
190 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How Leonardo DRS compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
7

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score26
Ranks 190 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers0%
Ranks 191 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness7
Ranks 228 of 246. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“Best power and propulsion systems for military vehicles in the U.S. market”

The U.S. military is actively pursuing and implementing advanced power and propulsion systems for its vehicles, moving towards more efficient, stealthy, and powerful options. This push is driven by the need for enhanced capabilities in contested environments, reduced reliance on traditional fuel supply lines, and the increasing electrical demands of modern military technology.

Key power and propulsion systems being developed and utilized in the U.S. military market include:

1. Hybrid-Electric Propulsion Systems:

The U.S. Army is significantly investing in hybrid-electric systems for its …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

BAE Systems Inc. (U.S.)
83.3%
L3Harris Technologies
16.7%
Leonardo DRS
0.0%
Raytheon (RTX)
0.0%
Northrop Grumman
0.0%
General Dynamics Mission Systems
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
31 of 100
  • robots.txtNot met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPartly met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
0 of 100
  • AI bot rulesNot met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPNot met

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 7 of 100 · 100% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · www.leonardodrs.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

apps.dtic.mil
24
army.mil
15
media.defense.gov
12
baesystems.com
11
fortunebusinessinsights.com
10
militaryaerospace.com
8
leonardodrs.com (its own website)
7
en.wikipedia.org
7
militaryembedded.com
7
marketsandmarkets.com
7

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What factors affect the cost of advanced power and propulsion solutions for defense?
  • Network computing versus traditional communications systems for defense operations
  • Best power and propulsion systems for military vehicles in the U.S. market
  • Typical pricing tiers for next-generation military communication networks
  • Alternatives to traditional sensor technologies for real-time threat detection
  • Is investing in modular military sustainment systems worth it for government defense agencies?
  • How does force protection technology compare to advanced sensing solutions for modern military applications?
  • Troubleshooting connectivity problems in secure military communication networks
  • How are advanced sensing technologies used to enhance battlefield decision-making?
  • What are the most advanced defense technology solutions available for battlefield awareness?
  • Do integrated situational awareness platforms provide significant value for U.S. defense partners?
  • Applications of force protection systems in safeguarding critical infrastructure
  • Common issues with implementing advanced power systems in military vehicles
  • Emerging trends in sustainment, logistics, and support services for the U.S. defense industry
  • Other options for ground vehicle power systems besides traditional diesel propulsion
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo