Back to the study

Lee Enterprises

lee.net · Media · LEE

Ranked 1,375 of 2,047 companies in the study

29Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations15
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness36
What this means for Lee Enterprises

AI assistants do not name Lee Enterprises in any of their 60 answers. Its overall score is 29 out of 100, ranking 1,375th of 2,047, while the typical company in its sector scores 36. Its website passes 5 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the media market: none named Lee Enterprises. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical media company is named in 15.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Lee Enterprises ranks 80 of 99 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
5/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
69 of 99
by overall score, where the typical media company scores 36
How Lee Enterprises compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
15

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
36

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with media

99 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score29
Ranks 69 of 99. Typical company: 36
Named in answers0%
Ranks 80 of 99. Typical company: 15%
AI readiness36
Ranks 13 of 99. Typical company: 29
What Perplexity actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“What are the best platforms for accessing local news in my area?”

The best platform depends on whether you want hyperlocal coverage, local TV news, or a broad mix of sources. For most people, the strongest options are Patch, NewsON, Zeam, Very Local, Local Now, Google News, and Apple News because they cover local stories in different ways and formats.

Patch is one of the best choices for community-level local news because it focuses on specific U.S. towns and neighborhoods and offers free hyperlocal coverage.

NewsON is a strong choice if you want live local TV newscasts a …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Hearst Newspapers
100.0%
Lee Enterprises
0.0%
Gannett (USA TODAY Network)
0.0%
McClatchy
0.0%
Tribune Publishing
0.0%
Advance Local
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
10 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPassed

    OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 29 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.lee.net · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 15 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBot*blocked
  • ClaudeBot*blocked
  • Anthropic-AI*blocked
  • Google-Extended*blocked
  • Applebot-Extended*blocked
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*blocked
  • FacebookBot*blocked
  • Bytespider*blocked
  • CCBot*blocked
  • Diffbot*blocked
  • Omgilibot*blocked
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBot*blocked
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBot*blocked
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBot*blocked
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-User*blocked
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

justdial.com
24
reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk
22
pewresearch.org
17
americanpressinstitute.org
15
patch.com
12
quora.com
11
niemanlab.org
8
tandfonline.com
8
shorensteincenter.org
8
tvnewscheck.com
8

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How does online community news compare to regional broadcast news?
  • Best ways to stay informed about community events and updates online
  • What’s the best way to submit a community announcement or classified ad online?
  • Differences between subscribing to a local news website and using free news aggregators
  • Are local news advertising packages effective for small businesses?
  • How much do local digital news subscriptions typically cost per month in the US?
  • What are the best platforms for accessing local news in my area?
  • How can local news platforms help connect small businesses with local audiences?
  • Digital local news subscriptions vs print newspaper subscriptions: pros and cons
  • What should I look for before purchasing local digital news access?
  • Top sources for high school sports news and coverage in US towns
  • How can I stop spam or unwanted notifications from local news websites?
  • What are alternatives to traditional local newspapers for staying updated on community happenings?
  • Why am I not receiving digital updates from my local news platform?
  • Is paying for a local news subscription worth it for access to community reporting?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo