Back to the study

Landstar System

landstar.com · Industrial · LSTR

Ranked 697 of 2,047 companies in the study

37Overall score
  • Visibility4
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality93
  • AI readiness7
What this means for Landstar System

AI assistants rarely name Landstar System: they mention it in 1 out of 60 answers, with C.H. Robinson, RXO, and XPO also named. Its overall score is 37 out of 100, placing it 697th of 2,047 companies. The website passes 1 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Landstar System. AI assistants named it in 1 of 60 answers (1.7%). The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Landstar System ranks 159 of 246 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
6.7%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
64 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How Landstar System compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
4

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
93

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
7

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score37
Ranks 64 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers2%
Ranks 159 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness7
Ranks 228 of 246. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“How can businesses find secure and reliable options for shipping large freight loads across the US?”

Businesses seeking secure and reliable options for shipping large freight loads across the US have several avenues to explore, focusing on reputable partners and robust security practices.

Here's how businesses can find secure and reliable freight shipping options:

1. Partner with Reliable Logistics Companies and Carriers:

Track Record and Expertise: Look for companies with a proven history of security, safety, and timely deliveries. Companies with decades of experience often have established relationships with reliable carriers and the expertise to handle disruptions and protect …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
C.H. Robinson3RXO1XPO1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

C.H. Robinson
40.0%
XPO
20.0%
Schneider Logistics
20.0%
Landstar System
10.0%
RXO
10.0%
Echo Global Logistics
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
1/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
0 of 100
  • robots.txtNot met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
0 of 100
  • AI bot rulesNot met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 0 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.landstar.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

locus.sh
15
freightwaves.com
14
freightcenter.com
11
atsinc.com
10
inboundlogistics.com
8
ryder.com
7
geodis.com
7
linkedin.com
7
spi3pl.com
6
dhl.com
6

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How do rates for custom freight shipping solutions compare to standard trucking services?
  • What are the key differences between using a freight brokerage and a logistics platform with an agent network?
  • What kind of shipping needs can an independent freight agent network handle for manufacturers?
  • Are there other ways to manage complex logistics needs besides using a third-party logistics platform?
  • What are the best options for customized freight shipping solutions for businesses in the US?
  • How can businesses find secure and reliable options for shipping large freight loads across the US?
  • What factors influence the cost of freight transportation when using a logistics solutions provider?
  • How can small businesses find reliable transportation services for nationwide delivery?
  • Are logistics platforms with owner-operator networks suitable for time-sensitive deliveries?
  • What should I do if my freight shipment is delayed while using a logistics platform?
  • How does working with independent freight agents compare to working directly with asset-based carriers?
  • Is it worth choosing a transportation network that relies on third-party carriers for freight shipping?
  • Do logistics services that focus on safety and reliability justify higher shipping costs for businesses?
  • How can businesses resolve issues with third-party capacity providers in logistics services?
  • What alternatives are available to agent-based transportation networks for business freight shipping?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo