Back to the study

The J.M. Smucker

jmsmucker.com · Consumer goods · SJM

Ranked 1,246 of 2,047 companies in the study

30Overall score
  • Visibility10
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness21
What this means for The J.M. Smucker

AI assistants rarely name The J.M. Smucker, appearing in 2 of 60 answers, which matches the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 30 out of 100, ranking 1,246th of 2,047 companies. The company's website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the consumer goods market: none named The J.M. Smucker. AI assistants named it in 2 of 60 answers (3.3%). The typical consumer goods company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, The J.M. Smucker ranks 56 of 118 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
3.3%
2 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
20.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
56 of 118
by overall score, where the typical consumer goods company scores 30
How The J.M. Smucker compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
10

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with consumer goods

118 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score30
Ranks 56 of 118. Typical company: 30
Named in answers3%
Ranks 56 of 118. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness21
Ranks 53 of 118. Typical company: 21
What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

“Where can I find food brands that cater to both human and pet needs?”

I can help you find food brands that cater to both human and pet needs. Let me search for current information on this.Based on the search results, here are some ways to find food brands that cater to both human and pet needs:

Major Companies Expanding into Pet Food

Well-established brands in the human food category like Purina, Alpo, Iams, and Meow Mix are now moving into the pet market. J.M. Smucker, best known for its jams, jellies, coffee, and other human foods, has expanded into pet food.

Human-Grade Pet Food Brands

Several brands focus on making pet food with ingredients suitabl …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

The J.M. Smucker
40.0%
Mars, Inc.
40.0%
General Mills
20.0%
Kraft Heinz Company
0.0%
Conagra Brands
0.0%
Nestlé USA
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
1/15
Gemini
1/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
72 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPartly met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 24 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.jmsmucker.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

justdial.com
21
reddit.com
12
bbc.co.uk
10
thekitchn.com
9
yahoo.com
7
tradeindia.com
7
target.com
6
amazon.com
6
consumerreports.org
6
mars.com
6

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What is the typical price range for pet foods and snacks in US supermarkets?
  • Where can I find food brands that cater to both human and pet needs?
  • What are some plant-based options in packaged convenience foods?
  • Popular pet care products for households with both cats and dogs?
  • Should I invest in single-serve coffee packs or buy ground coffee in bulk?
  • Best ways to use coffee products for entertaining guests at home?
  • Healthy alternatives to traditional sweet baked snacks for families?
  • Shelf-stable spreads versus refrigerated spreads: what's the difference?
  • Why do my spreads sometimes separate or change texture after opening?
  • How does frozen handheld food compare to fresh grab-and-go meals for convenience?
  • What are the best packaged food options for quick weekday breakfasts in the US?
  • Easy meal ideas using sweet baked snacks for kids' lunches?
  • How can I keep frozen handheld foods from getting freezer burn?
  • Is it worth buying premium pet snacks over standard varieties?
  • How does the cost of frozen handheld meals compare to takeout in the US?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo