Back to the study

International Motors

international.com · Automotive · NAV

Ranked 347 of 2,047 companies in the study

41Overall score
  • Visibility13
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality93
  • AI readiness21
What this means for International Motors

AI assistants name International Motors in 8.3% of answers, which is more often than the typical company in its sector. The company has an overall score of 41 out of 100, ranking 347th of 2,047. Its website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the automotive market: none named International Motors. AI assistants named it in 5 of 60 answers (8.3%). The typical automotive company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, International Motors ranks 18 of 49 in its sector.

Named by AI in
8.3%
5 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
20.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
2 of 49
by overall score, where the typical automotive company scores 31
How International Motors compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
13

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
93

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with automotive

49 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score41
Ranks 2 of 49. Typical company: 31
Named in answers8%
Ranks 18 of 49. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness21
Ranks 26 of 49. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are the best heavy-duty trucks for long-haul fuel efficiency?”

For long-haul operations, several heavy-duty trucks are recognized for their excellent fuel efficiency, primarily due to advancements in aerodynamics, engine technology, and integrated powertrains. Modern Class 8 trucks can achieve between 7 and 10 MPG under ideal highway conditions, with some optimized configurations pushing even higher.

Here are some of the best heavy-duty trucks for long-haul fuel efficiency:

Freightliner Cascadia: The Freightliner Cascadia is widely considered a leader in fuel economy for long-haul use. It consistently delivers high MPG on interstate runs, especi …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
International9Freightliner7Kenworth4Peterbilt4
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Freightliner
30.0%
International Motors
25.0%
Kenworth
25.0%
Peterbilt
20.0%
Volvo Trucks North America
0.0%
Mack Trucks
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
Perplexity
1/15
Claude
1/15
OpenAI
1/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.international.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

truckinginfo.com
15
international.com (its own website)
15
fleetrabbit.com
11
worktruckonline.com
10
fleetowner.com
10
cummins.com
9
justdial.com
9
alibaba.com
8
rushtruckcenters.com
8
masterstransportation.com
8

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (2 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Best options for replacing outdated engines in vocational trucks
  • Are severe-duty trucks suitable for construction site hauling?
  • Common maintenance issues with diesel engines in commercial vehicles
  • What are the best heavy-duty trucks for long-haul fuel efficiency?
  • Alternatives to diesel-powered engines for commercial transportation
  • What are must-have safety features in modern commercial trucks?
  • How much does it cost to maintain a long-haul truck fleet per year?
  • Which types of commercial buses are best for school transportation?
  • How to diagnose reduced fuel economy in heavy-duty trucks
  • Diesel engines vs. alternative fuel engines in commercial vehicles
  • Average price ranges for buying a new commercial bus in the US
  • Top features to look for in medium-duty commercial trucks for urban delivery fleets
  • Is it cost-effective to upgrade to the newest EPA-compliant truck engines?
  • Are integrated powertrain commercial trucks worth the investment for fleet operators?
  • Medium-duty vs. heavy-duty trucks: which is better for mixed cargo delivery?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 41 of 100 badge for International Motors

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/international.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/international.com.svg" alt="Overall score 41 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo