Back to the study

Icahn Enterprises

icahnenterprises.com · Unclassified · IEP

Ranked 1,297 of 2,047 companies in the study

29Overall score
  • Visibility14
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness7
What this means for Icahn Enterprises

AI assistants name Icahn Enterprises in 10% of answers, more often than the typical company in its group. It has an overall score of 29 out of 100, ranking 1,297th of 2,047 companies in the study. Its website passes 1 out of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market: none named Icahn Enterprises. AI assistants named it in 6 of 60 answers (10.0%). The typical company in its group is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Icahn Enterprises ranks 19 of 61 in its sector.

Named by AI in
10.0%
6 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
20.7%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
31 of 61
by overall score, where the typical company scores 29
How Icahn Enterprises compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
14

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
7

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with its group

61 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score29
Ranks 31 of 61. Typical company: 29
Named in answers10%
Ranks 19 of 61. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness7
Ranks 54 of 61. Typical company: 21
What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are the top diversified holding companies in the U.S. for multi-sector investment exposure?”

Here are widely-followed U.S. diversified holding companies you can consider for multi‑sector exposure, with a short note on what makes each diversified and a source you can check for details. If you want, I can sort these by market cap, dividend yield, or exposure to specific sectors (energy, insurance, industrials, etc.).

1) Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A / BRK.B) — the largest and most prominent U.S. conglomerate/holding company.

Why: owns large, operating subsidiaries across insurance, utilities (Berkshire Hathaway Energy), freight rail, manufacturing, retail, and a big publicly‑traded …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Berkshire Hathaway10Loews Corporation2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Berkshire Hathaway
50.0%
Icahn Enterprises
25.0%
Loews Corporation
12.5%
Brookfield Corporation
8.3%
Leucadia (Jefferies Financial Group)
4.2%
MRC Global
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
OpenAI
2/15
Perplexity
2/15
Claude
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
41 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardCould not check

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsCould not check

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestCould not check

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 28 of 100 · 79% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · www.ielp.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

investopedia.com
28
finance.yahoo.com
25
marketbeat.com
24
simplywall.st
19
sec.gov
17
en.wikipedia.org
12
home.saxo
11
zacks.com
11
fidelity.com
11
lsd.law
10

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (3 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What is the typical minimum investment to buy into diversified holding companies on U.S. stock exchanges?
  • Alternatives to diversified holding companies for cross-industry portfolio diversification?
  • How can diversified holding companies help mitigate investment risk?
  • What are the top diversified holding companies in the U.S. for multi-sector investment exposure?
  • How do management fees and expense ratios compare across diversified holding firms?
  • Who benefits most from investing in diversified holding companies?
  • Why might dividends from diversified holding companies be lower than expected?
  • Is investing in a diversified holding company worth it for long-term growth?
  • Private equity firm vs diversified holding company: key differences for investors?
  • How to interpret complex financial statements of diversified holding companies?
  • Best diversified holding firms to consider for exposure to energy and automotive industries?
  • How does a diversified holding company compare to an investment trust?
  • What investment vehicles offer similar risk profiles to diversified holding companies?
  • What should I look for before buying shares in a diversified holding company?
  • Which diversified holding companies focus on both real estate and pharma sectors?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 29 of 100 badge for Icahn Enterprises

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/icahnenterprises.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/icahnenterprises.com.svg" alt="Overall score 29 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo