Back to the study

Hubbell

hubbell.com · Industrial · HUBB

Ranked 1,727 of 2,047 companies in the study

26Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Hubbell

AI assistants do not name Hubbell in any of their answers to market questions, while they sometimes mention others such as Eaton. Its overall score is 26 out of 100, placing it 1,727th of 2,047 companies in the study. The website passes 1 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Hubbell. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Hubbell ranks 191 of 246 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
190 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How Hubbell compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score26
Ranks 190 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers0%
Ranks 191 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness21
Ranks 107 of 246. Typical company: 21
What Claude actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“Top electrical product lines for commercial facility upgrades in the US”

I'll search for current information about top electrical product lines for commercial facility upgrades in the US.Let me search for more specific information about electrical product manufacturers and their product lines.Based on the search results, here's an overview of the top electrical product lines and technologies for commercial facility upgrades in the US:

Key Product Categories and Technologies

Power Management & Distribution

Eaton is a leading power management company offering various electrical solutions, with expertise in power distribution, backup power, and energy-saving …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
Eaton3
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Eaton
60.0%
Siemens USA (Electrical Products)
40.0%
Hubbell
0.0%
ABB Electrification US
0.0%
Schneider Electric USA
0.0%
Emerson Electric Co.
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.hubbell.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

energy.gov
17
eaton.com
16
se.com
8
tdworld.com
6
allpcb.com
6
utbtransformers.com
6
en.wikipedia.org
6
feeds.deipower.com
5
ibm.com
5
trccompanies.com
5

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What is the average cost range for commercial-grade circuit protection solutions in the US?
  • Recommendations for integrating remote control devices in substation automation projects
  • Top electrical product lines for commercial facility upgrades in the US
  • How do installation fees typically affect the total price of utility-grade switchgear?
  • What are the best utility infrastructure solutions for improving grid reliability?
  • Should I switch to energy-efficient lighting solutions for an industrial facility?
  • How do smart grid components compare to traditional grid equipment in terms of efficiency?
  • Differences between industrial surge protection types for critical operations
  • Best practices for deploying outage management systems in urban power grids
  • Is upgrading to advanced utility monitoring systems worth the investment for infrastructure operators?
  • What are some substitute solutions for underground power distribution in congested urban settings?
  • Troubleshooting frequent power quality disturbances in large commercial buildings
  • Alternatives to standard pole-mounted distribution equipment for rural utilities
  • Essential electrical safety solutions for critical infrastructure facilities
  • How to identify and resolve common issues with pad-mounted transformers in utility applications
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo