Back to the study

Home BancShares

homebancshares.com · Finance · HOMB

Ranked 1,901 of 2,047 companies in the study

24Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality67
  • AI readiness29
What this means for Home BancShares

AI assistants do not name Home BancShares in any of their 60 answers, while they name companies like Regions Bank. The company has an overall score of 24 out of 100, ranking 1,901st of 2,047 overall and 181st of 205 in its sector. Its website passes 2 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the finance market: none named Home BancShares. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical finance company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Home BancShares ranks 135 of 205 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
181 of 205
by overall score, where the typical finance company scores 29
How Home BancShares compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
67

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with finance

205 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score24
Ranks 181 of 205. Typical company: 29
Named in answers0%
Ranks 135 of 205. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness29
Ranks 30 of 205. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“What are the top bank holding companies in the United States for small business services?”

Identifying the "top" bank holding companies for small business services can depend on various factors, including the specific needs of a small business (e.g., cash handling, international operations, financing) and how "top" is defined (e.g., largest loan portfolios, best customer service, digital tools).

Here's a breakdown of prominent bank holding companies and their subsidiaries often cited for their small business services:

Traditional Banks with Extensive Networks and Services:

JPMorgan Chase: Topping the list for business loan portfolios, Chase is frequently recommended a …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
Regions Bank3
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Regions Bank
88.9%
First Horizon Bank
11.1%
Home BancShares
0.0%
Bank OZK
0.0%
Simmons Bank
0.0%
Arvest Bank
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
41 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPNot met

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 16 of 100 · 100% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · homebancshares.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

usbank.com
26
bankrate.com
25
forbes.com
18
simplywall.st
18
nerdwallet.com
13
wise.com
13
regions.com
11
chase.com
9
federalreserve.gov
9
baselane.com
9

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Best financial institutions for personal checking and savings accounts in the US
  • What are the top bank holding companies in the United States for small business services?
  • How to resolve transaction delays at regional financial institutions?
  • Common issues when opening a new account with a US bank holding company
  • Bank holding company vs traditional bank: what's the difference for customers?
  • Are financial services from bank holding companies reliable for long-term investments?
  • Alternatives to using a bank holding company for business banking needs
  • What are some non-bank options for managing corporate funds in the US?
  • How does a community-focused bank holding company compare to a national corporate bank?
  • Typical fees associated with maintaining business accounts at US bank holding companies
  • Is it worth opening a business account with a regional bank holding company?
  • Most accessible financial institutions for personal banking in the Southeast US
  • Which financial institutions provide flexible lending solutions for small businesses?
  • What are the average interest rates on savings accounts from regional financial institutions?
  • Best types of bank accounts for real estate investors offered by US financial institutions?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo