Back to the study

Hearst Communications

hearst.com · Media

Ranked 1,666 of 2,047 companies in the study

26Overall score
  • Visibility4
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Hearst Communications

The AI assistants rarely name Hearst Communications, mentioning it in 1 of 60 answers. For comparison, News Corp is also named in the same answer. Hearst Communications has an overall score of 26 out of 100, ranking 1,666th of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 1 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the media market: none named Hearst Communications. AI assistants named it in 1 of 60 answers (1.7%). The typical media company is named in 15.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Hearst Communications ranks 75 of 99 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
7.1%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
87 of 99
by overall score, where the typical media company scores 36
How Hearst Communications compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
4

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with media

99 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score26
Ranks 87 of 99. Typical company: 36
Named in answers2%
Ranks 75 of 99. Typical company: 15%
AI readiness21
Ranks 53 of 99. Typical company: 29
What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

“Which US media conglomerates are recognized for innovative approaches in news, publishing, and information services?”

Several U.S. media conglomerates recognized for innovative approaches in news, publishing, and information services include News Corp, The New York Times Company, Hearst, BuzzFeed, Vice Media, and Empire Media Group. These companies are repeatedly identified in industry coverage as leaders in digital news innovation, media investment, or cross-platform content distribution.

News Corp: described as a global, diversified media and information services company spanning news and information services, book publishing, and digital real estate service …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
News Corp12
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

News Corp
77.8%
Hearst Communications
11.1%
Gannett (USA TODAY Network)
11.1%
Condé Nast
0.0%
Meredith Corporation (now Dotdash Meredith)
0.0%
Advance Publications
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
1/15
Gemini
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers

Some checks could not run. With them, up to level 2 would be possible.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
0 of 100
  • robots.txtCould not check

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapCould not check

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtCould not check

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
  • AI bot rulesCould not check

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsCould not check

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPNot met

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 0 of 100 · 51% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · www.hearst.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

en.wikipedia.org
14
digiday.com
7
linkedin.com
7
justdial.com
7
gartner.com
7
lead-spot.net
6
business.columbia.edu
5
deloitte.com
5
sec.gov
5
quora.com
5

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How can advertisers overcome low engagement when using diversified content networks?
  • How do pricing models differ for content syndication and advertising through large media networks?
  • Best information services firms offering data-driven solutions for businesses
  • Is investing in multi-platform media services worth it for small businesses?
  • Do information and media conglomerates provide better value than niche content providers?
  • How do diversified media conglomerates compare to digital-first media networks in terms of reach and influence?
  • What’s the difference between traditional media companies and global content platforms?
  • Why might a business not see results from using a media and information services company?
  • What factors affect the cost of partnering with a US-based diversified media group?
  • Options for businesses seeking content solutions outside of major global media companies
  • Ways businesses can use global media conglomerates for targeted advertising campaigns
  • What are alternatives to using a diversified information and media conglomerate for corporate communications?
  • Which US media conglomerates are recognized for innovative approaches in news, publishing, and information services?
  • How can organizations leverage multi-industry content services for brand storytelling?
  • What are the top diversified media conglomerates in the US for advertisers seeking broad content reach?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo