Back to the study

Haggen Food & Pharmacy

haggen.com · Retail

Ranked 1,952 of 2,047 companies in the study

23Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality67
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Haggen Food & Pharmacy

AI assistants do not name Haggen Food & Pharmacy in any of their answers out of 60. Its overall score is 23 out of 100, ranking 1,952nd of 2,047 companies. The website passes 3 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named Haggen Food & Pharmacy. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, Haggen Food & Pharmacy ranks 503 of 640 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
596 of 640
by overall score, where the typical retail company scores 34
How Haggen Food & Pharmacy compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
67

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with retail

640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score23
Ranks 596 of 640. Typical company: 34
Named in answers0%
Ranks 503 of 640. Typical company: 7%
AI readiness21
Ranks 351 of 640. Typical company: 29
What Perplexity actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“Best local grocery stores with online delivery options in my area”

The best option for local grocery stores with online delivery is usually Instacart, because it partners with local grocers in your area and is available in most ZIP codes. If you want a store-run service, Safeway and Winn-Dixie both offer online ordering with delivery in their service areas.

A practical short list:

Instacart — best for shopping from local stores near you; lets you order from multiple nearby grocers in one app.

Safeway — offers online ordering plus pickup or delivery where available.

Winn-Dixie — …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
Safeway4Albertsons3
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Safeway
60.0%
Albertsons
40.0%
Haggen Food & Pharmacy
0.0%
Fred Meyer
0.0%
QFC (Quality Food Centers)
0.0%
PCC Community Markets
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

Not by itself. Haggen Food & Pharmacy publishes none of the purchase protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the checkout like a person.

  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.haggen.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

justdial.com
18
supermarketnews.com
13
reddit.com
12
inkl.com
9
walgreens.com
8
cnet.com
7
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
7
instacart.com
7
tastingtable.com
7
facebook.com
6

In the study as US retailers: listed as a retailer in Wikidata, a public database, and among the websites Cloudflare Radar ranks as visited.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Best local grocery stores with online delivery options in my area
  • Best ways to use digital coupons when shopping at regional supermarkets
  • What should I do if my grocery delivery order has missing items?
  • Are grocery store loyalty programs really cost-effective for regular shoppers?
  • Options for affordable same-day grocery delivery in suburban areas
  • Alternatives to using local grocery stores for prescription fulfillment
  • How can I order party platters for pickup from a local grocery store?
  • How to resolve issues with pharmacy prescription pickup at grocery stores?
  • Curbside pickup vs home delivery for weekly grocery shopping
  • Is online grocery shopping worth it for busy families?
  • What are some alternatives for online bulk food shopping beyond regional supermarkets?
  • Where can I find grocery delivery with pharmacy services nearby?
  • What’s the average delivery fee for grocery orders in the US?
  • Full-service supermarket vs specialty grocery store: which is better for families?
  • How do grocery reward programs help lower weekly shopping costs?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo