Back to the study

Glik's

gliks.com · Retail

Ranked 153 of 2,047 companies in the study

44Overall score
  • Visibility12
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness64
What this means for Glik's

AI assistants rarely name Glik's, mentioning it in 2 out of 60 answers. Its overall score is 44 out of 100, ranking 153rd of 2,047 companies. The website passes 9 of 14 possible technical checks, showing some readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named Glik's. AI assistants named it in 2 of 60 answers (3.3%). The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, Glik's ranks 392 of 640 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
3.3%
2 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
25.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
9/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
38 of 640
by overall score, where the typical retail company scores 34
How Glik's compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
12

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
64

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with retail

640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score44
Ranks 38 of 640. Typical company: 34
Named in answers3%
Ranks 392 of 640. Typical company: 7%
AI readiness64
Ranks 9 of 640. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are the best boutique fashion stores for trendy denim in the US?”

For those seeking trendy denim at boutique fashion stores in the U.S., a variety of excellent options cater to different styles and preferences.

Stores Specializing in Raw and Japanese Selvedge Denim:

Self Edge (Multiple locations): Considered a premier destination for Japanese denim, Self Edge has set a high standard for raw denim retail. They have exclusive North American distribution rights for brands like Iron Heart, Flat Head, and Strike Gold.

Blue in Green (SoHo, NYC): Since 2006, this store has been a leading source for Japanese selvedge denim in the U.S., offering …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Glik's
66.7%
Altar'd State
33.3%
Buckle
0.0%
Dry Goods USA
0.0%
Maurices
0.0%
Von Maur
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

Yes. Glik's publishes a UCP profile, a file that tells an AI agent how to buy, and it includes checkout.

  • UCPPublished
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present

The page also offers an agent tools inside the browser: add to cart, update cart lines, proceed to checkout.

The shop runs on Shopify.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
20 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPassed

    OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourcePassed

    Metadata telling agents which authorization server to use.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 43 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.gliks.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

9 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • PassedMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • PassedWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

reddit.com
15
justdial.com
13
elle.com
11
thegoodtrade.com
10
nytimes.com
7
businessinsider.com
6
lemon8-app.com
5
fittedunderground.com
5
denimhunters.com
5
timeout.com
5

In the study as US retailers: listed as a retailer in Wikidata, a public database, and among the websites Cloudflare Radar ranks as visited.

Every question, and where the company came up (2 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What type of boutique jackets work best for layering in unpredictable Midwest weather?
  • What options exist for boutique-style fashion if I prefer sustainable clothing?
  • How do boutique denim retailers compare to mass-market fashion stores?
  • Are boutique fashion shops good for building an effortless wardrobe?
  • Where can I buy trendy denim online besides traditional boutiques?
  • How can I tell if a boutique sweater will last through multiple seasons?
  • What are some alternatives to shopping at physical boutique fashion stores?
  • What are the best boutique fashion stores for trendy denim in the US?
  • Boutique sweaters vs department store sweaters: what's the difference in quality and style?
  • Are there any affordable options for trendy boutique apparel for women?
  • Which men’s casual tops from boutique retailers are best for work-to-weekend outfits?
  • Is it worth paying more for boutique denim versus mainstream brands?
  • What should I do if my boutique denim order doesn't fit as expected?
  • Where can I find casual and stylish apparel for men and women in the Midwest?
  • How much should I expect to spend on quality boutique denim in the US?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo