Back to the study

GlassesUSA

glassesusa.com · Retail

Ranked 886 of 2,047 companies in the study

34Overall score
  • Visibility19
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality93
  • AI readiness21
What this means for GlassesUSA

AI assistants name GlassesUSA in 20% of answers, which is about three times as often as the typical company in the retail sector. Its overall score is 34 out of 100, ranking 886th of 2,047 companies. The website passes 3 of 14 technical checks measuring how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named GlassesUSA. AI assistants named it in 12 of 60 answers (20.0%). The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, GlassesUSA ranks 144 of 640 in its sector.

Named by AI in
20.0%
12 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
16.4%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
305 of 640
by overall score, where the typical retail company scores 34
How GlassesUSA compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
19

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
93

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with retail

640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score34
Ranks 305 of 640. Typical company: 34
Named in answers20%
Ranks 144 of 640. Typical company: 7%
AI readiness21
Ranks 351 of 640. Typical company: 29
What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

“Best online options for prescription sunglasses for driving in bright conditions?”

Short answer — look for sellers that offer (1) true polarization, (2) prescription-compatible polarized or photochromic (Drivewear/Transitions) options, (3) anti‑reflective (including back-surface AR) coatings, and (4) a good return/fit policy. Good online options that meet those criteria:

Recommended online retailers/brands

Warby Parker — easy online/virtual try‑on, prescription sunglasses with premium polarized lenses and straightforward returns. (warbyparker.com)

GlassesUSA — wide frame selection, many Rx sunglasses, Transi …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Warby Parker15Zenni Optical12EyeBuyDirect11FramesDirect4
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Warby Parker
25.0%
EyeBuyDirect
25.0%
Zenni Optical
25.0%
GlassesUSA
17.6%
FramesDirect
7.4%
Liingo Eyewear
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

OpenAI
4/15
Gemini
3/15
Perplexity
3/15
Claude
2/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

We could not tell. The website turned away our requests for the files an agent would read. An agent arriving by itself is turned away the same way.

  • UCPCould not check
  • ACPCould not check
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthCould not check

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogCould not check

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryCould not check

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceCould not check

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardCould not check

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsCould not check

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestCould not check

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 37 of 100 · 65% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.glassesusa.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

zennioptical.com
17
glasses.com
16
eyebuydirect.com
15
glassesusa.com (its own website)
14
lenscrafters.com
12
allaboutvision.com
11
nytimes.com
11
forbes.com
11
warbyparker.com
11
consumerreports.org
10

In the study as US retailers: listed as a retailer in Wikidata, a public database, and among the websites Cloudflare Radar ranks as visited.

Every question, and where the company came up (5 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Online eyewear retailers vs local optical stores—what are the main differences?
  • Best online options for prescription sunglasses for driving in bright conditions?
  • What are some alternatives to ordering discount prescription glasses online if I need them quickly?
  • Designer frames vs budget options for online glasses—what should I consider?
  • How much should I expect to pay for single vision vs progressive lenses from online eyewear retailers?
  • What factors affect the price of prescription eyeglasses when buying online?
  • What should I do if my new prescription glasses ordered online don’t fit correctly?
  • Where can I get affordable blue light blocking glasses for computer use online?
  • How do I shop online for prescription eyeglasses with home try-on options?
  • Are online sunglasses reliable for UV protection and lens quality?
  • How do I resolve issues with receiving the wrong prescription when buying eyeglasses online?
  • What are the best places to buy affordable prescription glasses online in the US?
  • Is it worth buying prescription glasses online instead of in-store?
  • Prescription eyeglasses vs contact lenses for daily wear—what are the pros and cons?
  • Where can I find a wide selection of discount prescription sunglasses with quick shipping?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 34 of 100 badge for GlassesUSA

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/glassesusa.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/glassesusa.com.svg" alt="Overall score 34 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo